Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719852›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2023

Unleashing the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: factors, strategies, and ongoing trials.

Jiahui Yu, Mengnan Li, Boxu Ren, Le Cheng, Xiaoxiao Wang, Zhaowu Ma, Wei Peng Yong, Xiaoguang Chen, Lingzhi Wang, Boon Cher Goh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. ANKRD1 expression and functional mechanism in stomach adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Emerging Immune-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CCR2Discovery immunology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiahui Yu *School of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Mengnan Li *School of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Boxu RenSchool of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Le ChengSchool of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Xiaoxiao WangSchool of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Zhaowu MaSchool of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Wei Peng YongDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Xiaoguang ChenSchool of Basic Medicine, Health Science Center, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China.
Lingzhi WangNUS Center for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Boon Cher GohDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent primary liver cancer, representing approximately 85% of cases. The diagnosis is often made in the middle and late stages, necessitating systemic treatment as the primary therapeutic option. Despite sorafenib being the established standard of care for advanced HCC in the past decade, the efficacy of systemic therapy remains unsatisfactory, highlighting the need for novel treatment modalities. Recent breakthroughs in immunotherapy have shown promise in HCC treatment, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the response rate to ICIs is currently limited to approximately 15%-20% of HCC patients. Recently, ICIs demonstrated greater efficacy in "hot" tumors, highlighting the urgency to devise more effective approaches to transform "cold" tumors into "hot" tumors, thereby enhancing the therapeutic potential of ICIs. This review presented an updated summary of the factors influencing the effectiveness of immunotherapy in HCC treatment, identified potential combination therapies that may improve patient response rates to ICIs, and offered an overview of ongoing clinical trials focusing on ICI-based combination therapy.

Indexed as

clinical trialcombination therapyhepatocellular carcinomaimmune checkpoint inhibitorspreclinical study

Identifiers

PMID37719852
PMCPMC10501787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.