Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719836›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

Developmental changes in individual alpha frequency: Recording EEG data during public engagement events.

Christopher Turner, Satu Baylan, Martina Bracco, Gabriela Cruz, Simon Hanzal, Marine Keime, Isaac Kuye, Deborah McNeill, Zika Ng, Mircea van der Plas and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Alpha oscillations are dysrhythmic in Fragile X syndrome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Christopher TurnerSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Satu BaylanSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Martina BraccoSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Gabriela CruzSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Simon HanzalSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Marine KeimeSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Isaac KuyeSchool of Molecular Biosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Deborah McNeillSchool of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Zika NgSchool of Molecular Biosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Mircea van der PlasSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Manuela RuzzoliBasque Center on Cognition Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain.
Gregor ThutSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Jelena TrajkovicSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Domenica VenieroSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sarah P WaleSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Sarah WhearSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Gemma LearmonthSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical power in cognitive neuroimaging experiments is often very low. Low sample size can reduce the likelihood of detecting real effects (false negatives) and increase the risk of detecting non-existing effects by chance (false positives). Here, we document our experience of leveraging a relatively unexplored method of collecting a large sample size for simple electroencephalography (EEG) studies: by recording EEG in the community during public engagement and outreach events. We collected data from 346 participants (189 females, age range 6-76 years) over 6 days, totalling 29 hours, at local science festivals. Alpha activity (6-15 Hz) was filtered from 30 seconds of signal, recorded from a single electrode placed between the occipital midline (Oz) and inion (Iz) while the participants rested with their eyes closed. A total of 289 good-quality datasets were obtained. Using this community-based approach, we were able to replicate controlled, lab-based findings: individual alpha frequency (IAF) increased during childhood, reaching a peak frequency of 10.28 Hz at 28.1 years old, and slowed again in middle and older age. Total alpha power decreased linearly, but the aperiodic-adjusted alpha power did not change over the lifespan. Aperiodic slopes and intercepts were highest in the youngest participants. There were no associations between these EEG indexes and self-reported fatigue, measured by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Finally, we present a set of important considerations for researchers who wish to collect EEG data within public engagement and outreach environments.

Indexed as

aperiodicElectroencephalographyFOOOFopen scienceoscillations

Identifiers

PMID37719836
PMCPMC10503479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.