ArticleJSES international2023
What is the most predictive magnetic resonance imaging finding of rotator cuff tear concomitant with shoulder stiffness?
Article in JSES international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment and validation of a screening and risk predication model for rotator cuff tear and shoulder stiffness.Annals of joint · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in adhesive capsulitis are not often evident in rotator cuff tear concomitant with shoulder stiffness. This study aimed to determine the most predictive MRI finding of rotator cuff tear with shoulder stiffness to differentiate from that without stiffness. Materials and methods: The data of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Stiffness was defined as forward flexion <120°, external rotation at side <30°, and internal rotation at back <L3 in the active range of motion. Propensity score matching (1-to-1) was performed between the stiff and control groups by sex, age, and tear size, and 76 patients per group were matched. Anterior capsular thickness, maximal humeral/glenoid capsular thickness in the axillary recess, coracohumeral ligament thickness, the presence of hyperintensity in the anterior capsule and humeral/glenoid capsule in the axillary recess, and hyperintensity and obliteration of the subcoracoid fat triangle were evaluated. Results: Anterior capsular thickness, glenoid capsular thickness in the axillary recess, and anterior and axillary capsular hyperintensities were significantly more dominant in the stiff group (all Conclusion: Anterior capsular thickening and abnormal hyperintensity were the most predictive MRI findings for stiffness in patients with rotator cuff tear and stiffness to differentiate from patients with rotator cuff tear without stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.