ArticleJSES international2023
Clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with subacromial bursa reimplantation: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in JSES international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Subacromial Bursa Augmentation on Self-Reported and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcomes in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective, Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Trial
- Undersurface rotator cuff repair for partial-thickness tears using the Opus knotless system: a prospective cohort of 1000 consecutive cases with a 1.4% retear rate.JSES international · 2026Article
- Augmentation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Enthesis Interpositional Allograft and Minced Autologous Subacromial Bursa.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Subacromial bursa augmentation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Clinical and doppler ultrasound assessment-A preliminary study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- The subacromial bursa in rotator cuff injury: from pathological contributor to regenerative resource?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Removal or retention: evolving views on possible roles of the subacromial bursa in rotator cuff disease.EFORT open reviews · 2025Review
- Combined Subacromial Bursal Stem Cell Therapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma Alongside Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery Reduces Postoperative Pain and Improves Functional Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Partial-Thickness Bursal-Site Rotator Cuff Repair With Autologous Bursa Augmentation.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- The Evolution of Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mini-open transosseous repair with bursal augmentation improves outcomes in massive rotator cuff tears.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The subacromial bursa has been found to be a rich, local, source of mesenchymal stem cells but is removed for visualization during rotator cuff repair. Reimplantation of this tissue may improve rotator cuff healing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with and without subacromial bursa reimplantation. Methods: Patients aged 37-77 with a full-thickness or near full-thickness supraspinatus tears underwent arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent double row rotator cuff repair. In patients prior to July 2019, the subacromial bursa was resected for visualization, and discarded. In patients after July 2019, the subacromial bursa was collected using a filtration device connected to an arthroscopic shaver and reapplied to the bursal surface of the tendon at the completion of the rotator cuff repair. Rotator cuff integrity was evaluated via magnetic resonance imaging on bursa patients at 6 months postoperatively. Minimum 18-month clinical outcomes (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, patient satisfaction) were compared between bursa and nonbursa cohorts. Results: A total of 136 patients were included in the study (control n = 110, bursa n = 26). Preoperative demographics and tear characteristics were not different between groups. Average follow-up was significantly longer in the control group (control: 3.2 ± 0.7 years; bursa: 1.8 ± 0.3 years; Conclusion: Augmentation of rotator cuff repair with bursal tissue does not appear to have negative effects, and given the accessibility and ease of harvest of this tissue, further research should be performed to evaluate its potential for improved tendon healing or clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.