Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719825›Full record

ArticleJSES international2023

Comparing bone shape models from deep learning processing of magnetic resonance imaging to computed tomography-based models.

Victoria Wong, Francesco Calivá, Favian Su, Valentina Pedoia, Drew Lansdown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria WongCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Francesco CaliváCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Favian SuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Valentina PedoiaCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Drew LansdownDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Promoting Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science in Aging by Resident InvestigatorsR38AG070171 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alison Huang, Ashwin Ajit Kotwal · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS R38 AG070171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning approach to automatically segment the scapular bone on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and to compare the accuracy of these three-dimensional (3D) models with that of 3D computed tomography (CT). Methods: Fifty-five patients with high-resolution 3D fat-saturated T2 MRI were retrospectively identified. The underlying pathology included rotator cuff tendinopathy and tears, shoulder instability, and impingement. Two experienced musculoskeletal researchers manually segmented the scapular bone. Five cross-validation training and validation splits were generated to independently train two-dimensional (2D) and 3D models using a convolutional neural network approach. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). All models with DSC > 0.70 were ensembled and used for the test set, which consisted of four patients with matching high-resolution MRI and CT scans. Clinically relevant glenoid measurements, including glenoid height, width, and retroversion, were calculated for two of the patients. Paired Results: The 2D and 3D models achieved a best DSC of 0.86 and 0.82, respectively, with no significant difference observed. Augmentation of imaging data significantly improved 3D but not 2D model performance. In comparing clinical measurements of 3D MRI and CT, there was a mean difference ranging from 1.29 mm to 3.46 mm and 0.05° to 7.47°. Conclusion: We have presented a fully automatic, deep learning-based strategy for extracting scapular shape from a high-resolution MRI scan. Further developments of this technology have the potential to allow for surgeons to obtain all clinically relevant information from MRI scans and reduce the need for multiple imaging studies for patients with shoulder pathology.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCTDeep learningMachine learningMRIScapula

Identifiers

PMID37719825
PMCPMC10499848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.