Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719771›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

EEG-based clinical decision support system for Alzheimer's disorders diagnosis using EMD and deep learning techniques.

Khalil AlSharabi, Yasser Bin Salamah, Majid Aljalal, Akram M Abdurraqeeb, Fahd A Alturki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khalil AlSharabiElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yasser Bin SalamahElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majid AljalalElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Akram M AbdurraqeebElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahd A AlturkiElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the existence of numerous clinical techniques for identifying neurological brain disorders in their early stages, Electroencephalogram (EEG) data shows great promise as a means of detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) at an early stage. The main goal of this research is to create a reliable and accurate clinical decision support system leveraging EEG signal processing to detect AD in its initial phases. Methods: The research utilized a dataset consisting of 35 neurotypical individuals, 31 patients with mild AD, and 22 patients with moderate AD. Data were collected while participants were at rest. To extract features from the EEG signals, a band-pass filter was applied to the dataset and the Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) technique was employed to decompose the filtered signals. The EMD technique was then leveraged to generate feature vectors by combining multiple signal features, thereby enhancing diagnostic performance. Various artificial intelligence approaches were also explored and compared to identify features of the extracted EEG signals distinguishing mild AD, moderate AD, and neurotypical cases. The performance of the classifiers was evaluated using k-fold cross-validation and leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation methods. Results: The results of this study provided valuable insights into potential avenues for the early diagnosis of AD. The performance of the various offered methodologies has been compared and evaluated by computing the overall diagnosis precision, recall, and accuracy. The proposed methodologies achieved a maximum classification accuracy of 99.9 and 94.8% for k-fold and LOSO cross-validation techniques, respectively. Conclusion: The study aims to assess and compare different proposed methodologies and determine the most effective combination approach for the early detection of AD. Our research findings strongly suggest that the proposed diagnostic support technique is a highly promising supplementary tool for discovering prospective diagnostic biomarkers that can greatly aid in the early clinical diagnosis of AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseartificial neural networkconvolutional neural networkdeep learningempirical mode decompositionK-foldleave-one-subject-out cross-validation

Identifiers

PMID37719771
PMCPMC10501399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.