Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719626›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Quantitative Benefit of Inpatient Dermatology Services on Hospital Length of Stay in an Academic Hospital.

Camilla Reimer, Erica Lee, Ashley Wysong, Corey Georgesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camilla ReimerDepartment of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Erica LeeDepartment of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Ashley WysongDepartment of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Corey GeorgesenDepartment of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermatologic disease has been shown to have high rates of diagnostic and treatment discordance between dermatologists and non-specialists. Inpatient dermatology consultative services have the potential to improve patient care, but there is a paucity of data evaluating the quantitative effects of such services. This study aimed to evaluate the impact a newly established inpatient dermatology service had on quantitative patient care outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study compared quantitative care measures of dermatologic inpatients during the years both pre- and post-implementation of an academic hospital's dermatology consultative service. The primary outcomes included hospitalization duration, readmission rates, and establishment of outpatient dermatologic care.

resultsThe study found a 1.04-day reduction in hospital length of stay (p-value = 0.046) after the consultation service establishment. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the rate by which patients sought outpatient dermatology follow-up (6.7% versus 24.4%, p-value <0.001). No significant change in the all-cause readmission rate was identified.

conclusionThe reduction of hospitalization duration supports inpatient dermatology services as a viable means to provide improved patient care and reduce health systems costs. Hospitals that do not have a consulting service for cutaneous conditions provided by a dermatology specialist should strongly consider establishing such a department.

Indexed as

care outcomescutaneous diseasedermatology consulthospital dermatologyinpatient consultsquality of care

Identifiers

PMID37719626
PMCPMC10501321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.