ReviewCureus2023
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma With Vascular Resection.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis examines the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery with vascular resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. A systematic literature search based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted, identifying five comparative retrospective cohort studies published from 2015 to 2021, with a total of 1,417 patients (180 in the vascular resection (VR) group and 1,237 in the control (no VR) group). The meta-analysis found that 30-day morbidity rates, as classified by Clavien-Dindo classification > 3, were higher in the VR group compared to the no VR group (46% versus 25%, odds ratio (OR): 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-8.69, p=0.44). Local recurrence rates during the follow-up period were similar between the two groups (30% versus 30%, OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.50-4.25, p=0.49). However, distant recurrence was more frequent in the VR group (32% versus 8.5%, OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.05-6.13, p=0.04). In conclusion, although oncovascular procedures are feasible for patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, the long-term outcomes appear to be worse when compared to procedures that do not involve vessel resections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.