ReviewCureus2023
The Efficacy and Safety of Oral Spironolactone in the Treatment of Female Pattern Hair Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adenosine as an Active Ingredient in Topical Preparations Against Hair Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Clinical Trials.Biomolecules · 2025Pooled it
- Spironolactone versus Bicalutamide for Female Pattern Hair Loss: A 24-Month Unicenter Retrospective Comparative Study of Effectiveness and Safety.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Female pattern hair loss.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- The Genetic Landscape of Androgenetic Alopecia: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Biology · 2026Review
- Approaches to management of endocrine therapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Review
- Improving efficacy and maintaining safety in the treatment of alopecia with low-dose oral minoxidil and spironolactone combination therapy: A retrospective review.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Hair transplantation versus scalp micropigmentation: A retrospective study of treatment selection in persons with female pattern hair loss.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2024Article
- The Hormonal Background of Hair Loss in Non-Scarring Alopecias.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral spironolactone has been proposed as a potential treatment for hair loss due to its antiandrogenic properties. However, the efficacy and safety of spironolactone for treating hair loss are not well-established. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the current literature on the use of oral spironolactone in female pattern hair loss. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of oral spironolactone for treating hair loss. We searched for eligible papers in PubMed, Web of Science (ISI), Embase, and Scopus. All analyses were done using R software version 4.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The overall rate of improved hair loss was 56.60%, with a higher rate of improvement (65.80%) observed in the combined therapy group compared to the monotherapy group (43.21%). However, there was significant heterogeneity in the efficacy outcomes, and hair loss did not improve or showed a modest improvement in 37.80% of all patients. The rates of adverse events reported in at least two studies were scalp pruritus or increased scurf (18.92%), menstrual disorders (11.85%), facial hypertrichosis (6.93%), and drug discontinuation (2.79%). The overall adverse events rate was 3.69%, but there was significant heterogeneity in the rates of different adverse events. In conclusion, the present study suggests that spironolactone is an effective and safe treatment option for hair loss. However, further research is needed to fully understand the heterogeneity of treatment response and adverse events and identify factors that may predict treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.