ArticleCureus2023
Cerebral Radiation-Induced Vasculopathy Mimicking Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cranial irradiation is one of the main treatment modalities for tumors of the CNS. However, it can lead to significant damage to the treated region. Among the late complications of radiation therapy to the brain is vasculopathy of the small and/or large arteries. In this article, we report a case of CNS radiation-induced vasculopathy presenting 30 years after cranial irradiation and mimicking primary CNS vasculitis. The present case illustrates the importance of monitoring and carefully evaluating delayed side effects of radiotherapy as well as emphasizes the importance of obtaining a detailed history of any patient presenting with sudden unexplained symptoms. If a complete proper history of the patient's past medical diagnoses and procedures was taken, medical professionals would not have needed to conduct extensive investigations and implement treatment plans for a less likely diagnosis, in this case, aggressive treatment of a possible primary CNS vasculitis with high-dose steroids. Therefore, it is imperative to raise the possibility of radiation-induced vasculopathy after excluding all possible causes of deterioration in patients with a history of cranial radiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.