Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719482›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The POT-PUFF Sign: A New Angiographic Indicator of Stent Malapposition During Proximal Optimization Therapy.

Zakariae Laraichi, Raid Faraj, Nadia Fellat

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zakariae LaraichiCardiology A Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital/Mohammed V University Rabat, Rabat, MAR.
Raid FarajCardiology B Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital/Mohammed V University Rabat, Rabat, MAR.
Nadia FellatCardiology A Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital/Mohammed V University Rabat, Rabat, MAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute stent malapposition poses a significant risk for adverse cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Detection of acute stent malapposition traditionally relies on intracoronary imaging techniques, such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, which may be limited in developing countries due to accessibility issues. A new angiographic sign called the

Indexed as

coronary angiographyintracoronary imagingpcipot-puff signstent malapposition

Identifiers

PMID37719482
PMCPMC10502443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.