Targeted Cardiac Ionizing Radiation in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats Can Improve Recovery From Ischemic Injury.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Low-Dose Cardiac Radiation Improves Electrical Function and Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmogenesis in Mice With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026
   Article
2. METTL3 Modulates Radiation-Induced Cardiac Fibrosis via the Akt/mTOR Pathway.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
   Article
3. Cardiac radiation improves ventricular function in mice and humans with cardiomyopathy.Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.