Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719408›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2023

Assessing commitment to reflection: perceptions of medical students.

Joanie Poirier, Kathleen Ouellet, Valérie Désilets, Ann Graillon, Marianne Xhignesse, Christina St-Onge

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The overcrowded curriculum is alarming.Canadian medical education journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanie PoirierDepartment of psychology, Faculty of letters and human sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Kathleen OuelletCentre de pédagogie et des sciences de la santé, Faculty of medicine and health sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Valérie DésiletsDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of medicine and health sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Ann GraillonDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of medicine and health sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marianne XhignesseDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of medicine and health sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Christina St-OngeDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of medicine and health sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While developing reflection skills is considered important by educators, the assessment of these skills is often associated with unintended negative consequences. In the context of a mandatory longitudinal course that aims to promote the development of reflection on professional identity, we assessed students' commitment to reflection. This study explores students' perception of this assessment by their mentor. Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with twenty-one 1 Results: We identified four main themes: 1- assessment as a motivator, 2- consequences on authenticity, 3- perception of inherent subjectivity, and 4 - relationship with the mentor. Conclusions: In the context of assessing reflection skills in future physicians, we observed that students -when assessed on the process of reflection- experienced high motivation but were ambivalent on the question of authenticity. The subjectivity of the assessment as well as the relationship with their mentor also raises questions. Nevertheless, this assessment approach for reflective skills appears to be promising in terms of limiting the negative consequences of assessment.

Indexed as

PhysiciansStudents, MedicalAffectHumansMentorsMotivation

Identifiers

PMID37719408
PMCPMC10500401
OpenAlexW4386333236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.