ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2023
Single-center experience of endovascular treatment for patients with progressive posterior circulation cerebral infarction exceeding 24 h.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular revascularization for progressive stroke beyond conventional time windows: safety, efficacy, and predictors of technical failure and restenosis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Factors influencing functional recovery in posterior circulation stroke following mechanical thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Stroke progression index as a dynamic metric is associated with functional outcome in progressive ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence of endovascular treatment (ET) for patients with progressive infarction of the posterior circulation exceeding 24 h is lacking. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ET for progressive posterior circulation cerebral infarction. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the ET for 18 patients with posterior circulation infarction caused by vertebrobasilar artery occlusion from July 2017 to November 2018. The conditions of patients worsened despite receiving intravenous thrombolysis or combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin. The time from the onset of cerebral infarction to puncture was >24 h. The preoperative National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and related risk factors of patients at 3 months were analyzed postoperatively. Results: The preoperative NIHSS score was 10.6 (IQR: 6.5), and the time from onset to puncture was 163.5 ± 144.7 h. Postoperative blood flow was modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grade 2b or above. During the follow-up period, 1 patient died of basilar artery re-occlusion and pulmonary infection, and 1 died of postoperative hyperperfusion hemorrhage, with a mortality rate of 11.1% (2/18). No recurrent ischemic events were observed in any of the 16 patients during the 3-month follow-up period. The mean mRS score was 1.3 (IQR: 2.3), and 75% patients (12/16) had an mRS score of 0-2. There were no significant differences in age, gender, clinical characteristics, and stroke subtype between patients with mRS scores ≤2 and >2. Conclusion: In patients with progressive posterior circulation cerebral infarction caused by vertebral basilar artery occlusion, ET is effective and safe even if the time from onset to puncture exceeds 24 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.