ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023
Automated HL7v2 LRI informatics framework for streamlining genomics-EHR data integration.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Common data models and data standards for tabular health data: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Integration of pharmacogenetic data in epic genomic module drives clinical decision support alerts.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While VCF formatted files are the lingua franca of next-generation sequencing, most EHRs do not provide native VCF support. As a result, labs often must send non-structured PDF reports to the EHR. On the other hand, while FHIR adoption is growing, most EHRs support HL7 interoperability standards, particularly those based on the HL7 Version 2 (HL7v2) standard. The HL7 Version 2 genomics component of the HL7 Laboratory Results Interface (HL7v2 LRI) standard specifies a formalism for the structured communication of genomic data from lab to EHR. We previously described an open-source tool (vcf2fhir) that converts VCF files into HL7 FHIR format. In this report, we describe how the utility has been extended to output HL7v2 LRI data that contains both variants and variant annotations (e.g., predicted phenotypes and therapeutic implications). Using this HL7v2 converter, we implemented an automated pipeline for moving structured genomic data from the clinical laboratory to EHR. We developed an open source hl7v2GenomicsExtractor that converts genomic interpretation report files into a series of HL7v2 observations conformant to HL7v2 LRI. We further enhanced the converter to produce output conformant to Epic's genomic import specification and to support alternative input formats. An automated pipeline for pushing standards-based structured genomic data directly into the EHR was successfully implemented, where genetic variant data and the clinical annotations are now both available to be viewed in the EHR through Epic's genomics module. Issues encountered in the development and deployment of the HL7v2 converter primarily revolved around data variability issues, primarily lack of a standardized representation of data elements within various genomic interpretation report files. The technical implementation of a HL7v2 message transformation to feed genomic variant and clinical annotation data into an EHR has been successful. In addition to genetic variant data, the implementation described here releases the valuable asset of clinically relevant genomic annotations provided by labs from static PDFs to calculable, structured data in EHR systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.