Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719173›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Methods primers2021

Atom probe tomography.

Baptiste Gault, Ann Chiaramonti, Oana Cojocaru-Mirédin, Patrick Stender, Renelle Dubosq, Christoph Freysoldt, Surendra Kumar Makineni, Tong Li, Michael Moody, Julie M Cairney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Methods primers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Primitive icosahedral quasicrystals in ZnMgLi(Dy, Ho, Er, Tm) systems.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A workflow for correlativeNanoscale horizons · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Baptiste GaultMax-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4934-0458
Ann ChiaramontiNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Chemicals and Materials Division, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9933-3267
Oana Cojocaru-MirédinI. Institute of Physics (IA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6543-203X
Patrick StenderInstitute of Materials Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2324-5479
Renelle DubosqDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1364-1574
Christoph FreysoldtMax-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7896-3478
Surendra Kumar MakineniDepartment of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4493-6498
Tong LiInstitute for Materials, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5729-1839
Michael MoodyDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9256-0966
Julie M CairneyAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atom probe tomography (APT) provides three-dimensional compositional mapping with sub-nanometre resolution. The sensitivity of APT is in the range of parts per million for all elements, including light elements such as hydrogen, carbon or lithium, enabling unique insights into the composition of performance-enhancing or lifetime-limiting microstructural features and making APT ideally suited to complement electron-based or X-ray-based microscopies and spectroscopies. Here, we provide an introductory overview of APT ranging from its inception as an evolution of field ion microscopy to the most recent developments in specimen preparation, including for nanomaterials. We touch on data reconstruction, analysis and various applications, including in the geosciences and the burgeoning biological sciences. We review the underpinnings of APT performance and discuss both strengths and limitations of APT, including how the community can improve on current shortcomings. Finally, we look forwards to true atomic-scale tomography with the ability to measure the isotopic identity and spatial coordinates of every atom in an ever wider range of materials through new specimen preparation routes, novel laser pulsing and detector technologies, and full interoperability with complementary microscopy techniques.

Identifiers

PMID37719173
PMCPMC10502706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.