ArticlePeerJ2023
Evaluating the Turkish validity and reliability of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in periodontal diseases.
Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Psychological impact of genetic eligibility for CFTR modulator therapy in children with cystic fibrosis and their parents.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of central sensitization and associated factors in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Living with Hypertension: An Investigation of Illness Perception from a Primary Care Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity assessment of a Turkish version of the oral and systemic health impact profile for periodontal disease (OSHIP-Perio).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Determinants of health literacy and its impact on illness perception in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence from patient-reported outcomes.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
- First Balkan Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-B) among high-risk pregnancies.PloS one · 2025Article
- Impact of Noise on Medical Anxiety in Hospitalized Children with Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study.Noise & healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ) is a widely used multifactorial scale that assesses the individuals' perceptions of illness. Although there are studies investigating the psychometric properties of the Brief IPQ in many languages, the Turkish version of Brief IPQ on periodontal diseases has not been revealed so far. This study aimed to evaluate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Brief IPQ and contribute to the literature. It is also aimed to evaluate the patients' illness perception with periodontal disease and to reveal the possible effects of the disease on the patients' daily life. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 209 patients with periodontal diseases (137 gingivitis and 72 periodontitis cases). Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical periodontal measurements of all patients were recorded. The Turkish versions of the Brief IPQ and the HAD Scale were applied to the patients Results: The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale has one factor. The Spearman's correlation coefficient results were found 0.843 and 0.854 for concurrent validity. Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was 0.944 in the internal consistency analysis. ICC value was found to be 0.987 for test-retest reliability. Floor/ceiling effects were considered not to be present. Conclusions: It was found that the Turkish version of The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire is valid and reliable. Brief IPQ may be used to determine the illness perception in patients with periodontal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.