Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719098›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2023

The nature of embryonic mosaicism across female age spectrum: an analysis of 21,345 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles.

Abigail Armstrong, Lindsay Kroener, Jenna Miller, Anissa Nguyen, Lorna Kwan, Molly Quinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abigail ArmstrongDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Lindsay KroenerDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Jenna MillerCooperSurgical, Livingston, New jersey.
Anissa NguyenDepartment of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Lorna KwanDepartment of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Molly QuinnDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To understand how mosaicism varies across patient-specific variables and clinics. Design: Cross-sectional cohort. Setting: Genetic testing laboratory. Patients: A total of 86,208 embryos from 17,366 patients underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing. Interventions: Mosaic embryos were classified as either low-level (20%-40%) or high-level (40%-80%) and by type of mosaic error: single segmental, complex segmental, single chromosome, or complex abnormal mosaic. The rate of mosaicism was stratified by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology age categories: <35 years, 35-37 years, 38-40 years, 41-42 years, and >42 years. Main Outcome Measures: Distribution of chromosomal findings and prevalence of mosaicism type by age. Probability of creating mosaic embryos in a subsequent cycle. Results: Among all embryos, 44% were euploid, 40.2% were aneuploid, and 15.8% were mosaic. Both low-level and high-level mosaicism were more prevalent among younger patients. Of all mosaic embryos, the youngest age cohort <35 years had the highest proportions of single and complex segmental mosaicism (37.9% and 6.8%, respectively), whereas those aged >42 years had the highest single whole chromosome and complex abnormal mosaicism (37.1% and 34.0%, respectively). Although there was variability in mosaic rates across clinics, the median mosaic rate over 3 years ranged from 14.48% to 17.72%. A diagnosis of a mosaic embryo in a previous cycle did not increase a patient's odds for having a mosaic embryo in a subsequent cycle. Conclusions: Mosaicism is overall higher in younger patients, but the complexity of mosaic errors increases with age. A history of mosaicism was not associated with mosaicism in subsequent cycles. Additional research is needed to understand the etiologies of the various subtypes of mosaic embryos and clinical outcomes associated with their transfer.

Indexed as

mosaicism typesMosaic ratessegmentalwhole chromosome

Identifiers

PMID37719098
PMCPMC10504531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.