Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719058›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2023

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and their clinical relevance in selected women diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer in Kenya: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Josephine Nyabeta Rioki, Lucy Muchiri, Marshal Mweu, Joshua Nyagol, Elijah Songok, Joseph Mwangi, Micah Oyaro, Laban Bwire Ong'ang'o, Emily Rogena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josephine Nyabeta RiokiDepartment of Human Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lucy MuchiriDepartment of Human Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Marshal MweuDepartment of Public and Global Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joshua NyagolDepartment of Human Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elijah SongokKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
Joseph MwangiKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
Micah OyaroDepartment of Human Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Laban Bwire Ong'ang'oMassive Genomics solutions, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emily RogenaDepartment of Pathology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous breast cancer type with a poor prognosis. About 25% of TNBC patients carry breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) mutations. Screening for BRCA mutations would facilitate early detection and initiation of personalized therapy, thus improving prognosis. However, this has not been explored in our population. We aimed at identifying BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and their clinical relevance among selected women with TNBC in Kenya. Methods: six participants enrolled in a larger descriptive cross-sectional study who met the inclusion criteria were selected. Structured questionnaires were used to obtain qualitative data. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from saliva. Whole exome sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes using a next-generation sequencer was done. Results: overall, 83.3% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations with clinical relevance were detected. Most of the variants (63%) were found in BRCA1 whereas 37% were found in BRCA2. Pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 gene included c.5513T>A, c.5291T>C, c.5297T>G, c.110C>A, c.5212G>C, c.122A>C, c.5117G>A, c.5095C>T, c.5054C>T, c.5053A>G, c.115T>A, c.5143A>G, and c.130T>G. Those in BRCA2 gene were c.7878G>A, c.9154C>T, c.8243G>A, c.7976G>A, c.8165C>G, c.8167G>C, and c.8168A>T. One variant (c.5352delG: p. Leu1785Terfs) not matching any in the BRCA Exchange and ClinVar databases was detected. Conclusion: our study revealed BRCA mutations that could be common among our population. Further, it has shown that BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutations identified are of clinical relevance and there is a need to screen for these mutations in breast cancer patients to understand their implication in patient management outcomes.

Indexed as

Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinClinical RelevanceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaMutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1BRCA2Genespathogenic mutationtriple-negative breast neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37719058
PMCPMC10504444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.