Trial reportThe Pan African medical journal2023
McGrath® versus Macintosh laryngoscopes on hemodynamic response to intubation in elderly patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in The Pan African medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope for intubation undergoing general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation induce catecholaminergic release. Our study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of orotracheal intubation by McGrath® compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope in the elderly. Methods: we conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial that included elderly patients proposed for a scheduled surgery under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation and divided into 2 groups: patients who were intubated using the McGrath® (group V) and patients who were intubated using the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (group M). Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), were recorded before induction of anesthesia (baseline), and at 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min after intubation. Our outcomes were the increase of SBP (∆ SBP), MAP (∆ MAP), and HR (∆ HR) between the two groups, during the 5 minutes following the start of the orotracheal intubation, intubation time and the incidence of its related complications. Results: sixty patients were included and randomized into 2 groups of 30. The average age of our sample was 70±6 years with a sex ratio of 1.22. Most of the patients were operated on for orthopedic, urologic, or abdominal surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics and the duration of anesthesia (p> 0.05). The intubation time was significantly increased in group M (p≤0.001). There was a significant difference in SBP, MAP, and HR values at 1 min after orotracheal intubation compared with the baseline values in Group V(P<0,05) and Group M (p < 0.05). There was a significant increase in the first minute after tracheal intubation in terms of SBP (151±42 vs 134.5±26 mmHg, p=0.012), MAP (114±4 vs 102±17 mmHg, p=0.015), DBP (89±32 vs 84±16 mmHg, p=0.01), and HR (99.5±10 vs 94.5±2 b/min, p=0.008) when group M was compared to group V. The ∆SBP was significantly different between group M (∆SBP = 36.2±23.5mmHg) and group V (∆SBP= 30.77±21.6mmHg) (p = 0.005). There were 4 ventricular arrhythmias in group M versus zero in group V (p <0.0001). The postoperative sore throat was significantly decreased in group M vs V (p=0.036). Conclusion: the McGrath® videolaryngoscope decreased the hemodynamic fluctuations due to endotracheal intubation in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.