Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37718651›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2023

Examining the Malleability of Negative Views of Aging, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, and Behavioral Intentions in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

Manfred Diehl, George W Rebok, David L Roth, Abigail Nehrkorn-Bailey, Diana Rodriguez, Han-Yun Tseng, Diefei Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Felt Age and Its Psychological Correlates in Dementia Spousal Caregiving Dyads: Findings From the IDEAL Programme.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manfred DiehlDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2055-3839
George W RebokDepartment of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
David L RothCenter on Aging and Health, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-0536
Abigail Nehrkorn-BaileyDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA.
Diana RodriguezDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Han-Yun TsengDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Diefei ChenCenter on Aging and Health, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Colorado State University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Green Bay · US

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS OF AGINGT32AG000247 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Karen J. Bandeen-Roche · 1996 to 2026
$13.2M
Testing Psychological Mechanisms to Promote Physical Activity in AdultsR01AG051723 · NIA · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, MANFRED K. · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG051723NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000247NIH HHS R01 AG051723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the malleability of a tripartite cluster of purported mechanistic variables targeted in a 4-week intervention program designed to improve adults' engagement in physical activity. The targeted cluster of purported mechanisms consisted of negative views of aging (NVOA), self-efficacy beliefs, and behavioral intentions.

methodsA randomized single-blind control group design was used to implement the AgingPLUS program in a sample of middle-aged and older adults (N = 335; Mage = 60.1 years; SDage = 8.3 years; age range 45-75 years).

resultsUsing an intention-to-treat approach and analyses of covariance adjusting for participants' baseline scores, findings showed significant improvements in the purported mechanistic variables both at the immediate (Week 4) and delayed posttest (Week 8) in the treatment group but not in the control group. These improvements were for the most part maintained until 8-month postrandomization, although to a smaller extent. Specifically, participants in the AgingPLUS group showed significant improvements in NVOA, self-efficacy beliefs, and behavioral intentions compared to the Health Education control group. Standardized effect sizes for statistically significant effects were variable and ranged from small (d = -0.23) to large (d = 0.80). Effect sizes showed some decay of the intervention at the 8-month posttest. DISCUSSION: Taken together, the findings supported the efficacy of the AgingPLUS program and showed that variables representing the purported mechanisms of the intervention were significantly moved in a positive direction. In doing so, the AgingPLUS program met a major requirement of the experimental medicine approach to behavior change interventions. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT0329948.

Indexed as

IntentionSelf EfficacyAgedAgingHealth EducationHumansMiddle AgedSingle-Blind Methodbehavioral intentionsexperimental medicine approachNegative views of agingself-efficacy beliefs

Identifiers

PMID37718651
PMCPMC10699749
OpenAlexW4386818039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.