ArticlePediatric radiology2023
Non-sedated fast spine magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scoliosis as a Paradigm of Pathological Spinal Curvature: Molecular Mechanisms and Imaging Innovations : Molecular and Imaging Insights in Scoliosis.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- As fast as an X-ray: real-time magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols require sedation in young children and uncooperative patients. There is an increased interest in non-sedated pediatric MRI protocols to reduce risks associated with anesthetic agents and improve MRI access.
objectiveTo evaluate the image quality of pediatric non-sedated fast spine MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 69 pediatric non-sedated fast spine MRI exams performed in 57 patients. Two blinded readers provided image quality ratings for the evaluation of bones, cranio-cervical junction, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces, spinal cord, soft tissues, ligaments, and overall diagnostic quality on a 1-5 scale, and determined whether there was evidence of syringomyelia, abnormal conus medullaris position, or filum terminale abnormality.
resultsMean patient age was 7.2 years (age range ≤ 1-17). Indications included syringomyelia (n=25), spinal dysraphism (n=4), combination of both syringomyelia and spinal dysraphism (n=8), and other miscellaneous indications (n=32). The inter-observer agreement ranged between moderate and very good for each variable (Cohen's weighted kappa] range=0.45-0.69). The highest image quality ratings were given to CSF spaces (mean image quality=3.5/5 ± 0.8) and cranio-cervical junction evaluations (3.5/5 ± 0.9). Overall diagnostic quality was worst in the <5 years group (P=0.006). Readers independently identified a cervical spinal cord syrinx in 6 cases, and 1 mm spinal cord central canal dilation in one case. Readers agreed on the position of the conus medullaris in 92% of cases (23/25 cases).
conclusionNon-sedated pediatric spine MRI can be an effective diagnostic test to evaluate for spine pathology, especially syringomyelia, Chiari malformation, and conus medullaris anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.