Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37718296›Full record

ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2023

Outcomes of hyperbaric oxygen treatment for central and branch retinal artery occlusion at a major Australian referral hospital.

Jeremy Williamson, Anil Sharma, Alexander Murray-Douglass, Matthew Peters, Lawrence Lee, Robert Webb, Kenneth Thistlethwaite, Thomas P Moloney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy WilliamsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Anil SharmaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Alexander Murray-DouglassDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Matthew PetersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Lawrence LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Robert WebbDepartment of Hyperbaric Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Kenneth ThistlethwaiteDepartment of Hyperbaric Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Thomas P MoloneyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study analysed the treatment outcomes of patients that received hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for retinal artery occlusion (RAO) at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital in Brisbane, Australia between 2015 and 2021. Methods: Retrospective study from patient records including 22 eyes from 22 patients that received HBOT for either central RAO (17 patients) or branch RAO (five patients). Patients received the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital RAO protocol for their HBOT. Analysis included best corrected visual acuity pre- and post-treatment, subjective improvements, side effects and patient risk factors were also recorded. Results: Improvement in best corrected visual acuity was LogMAR -0.2 for central RAO on average with 8/17 (47%) experiencing objective improvement, 5/17 (29%) experienced no change and 4/22 (24%) experienced a reduction in best corrected visual acuity. Subjective improvement (colour perception or visual fields) was reported in an additional 4/17 patients, resulting in 12/17 (71%) reporting improvement either in visual acuity or subjectively. There was no improvement in the best corrected visual acuity of any of the five patients suffering from branch RAO. Cardiovascular risk factors present in the cohort included hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, previous cardiovascular events, cardiac disease and smoking. Limited side effects were experienced by this patient cohort with no recorded irreversible side effects. Conclusions: Hyperbaric oxygen treatment appears a safe, beneficial treatment for central RAO. No benefit was demonstrated in branch RAO although numbers were small. Increased awareness of HBOT for RAO resulting in streamlined referrals and transfers and greater uptake of this intervention may further improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Hyperbaric OxygenationRetinal Artery OcclusionAustraliaFemaleHospitalsHumansOxygenRetrospective StudiesOxygenBlindnessCirculationOphthalmologyRetinal artery occlusion

Identifiers

PMID37718296
PMCPMC10735708
OpenAlexW4386817608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.