ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2023
Comparative Study of Histotripsy Pulse Parameters Used to Inactivate Escherichia coli in Suspension.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of low-amplitude pulse interspersed with histotripsy treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on surgical mesh.Ultrasonics · 2025Article
- Doppler-based assessment of boiling histotripsy-induced volumetric tissue liquefaction in vivo.Ultrasonics · 2025Article
- Histotripsy-Induced Bactericidal Activity Correlates to Size of Cavitation Cloud In Vitro.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
- Therapeutic ultrasound transducer technology and monitoring techniques: a review with clinical examples.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBacterial loads can be effectively reduced using cavitation-mediated focused ultrasound, or histotripsy. In this study, gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli) in suspension were used as model bacteria to evaluate the effectiveness of two regimens of histotripsy treatments: cavitation histotripsy (CH) and boiling histotripsy (BH).
methodsTen-milliliter volumes of Escherichia coli were treated at different negative focal pressure amplitudes and over time periods up to 40 min. Cavitation activity was characterized with coaxial passive cavitation detection (PCD) and synchronized plane wave B-mode imaging.
resultsCH treatments exhibited a threshold behavior that was consistent with PCD metrics of cavitation. Above the threshold, bacterial inactivation followed a monotonically increasing log-linear relationship that indicated an exponential inactivation rate. BH exhibited no threshold, but instead followed a different monotonically increasing inactivation rate. Inactivation rates were larger for BH at or below the CH threshold, and larger for CH substantially above the threshold. CH studies performed at different pulse lengths at the same duty cycle had similar inactivation rates, suggesting that at any given pressure amplitude, the "on time" was the most important variable for inactivating E. coli. The maximum inactivation was produced by CH at the highest pressure amplitudes used, leading to a log reduction >4.2 for a 40 min treatment.
conclusionThe results of this study suggest that both CH and BH can be used to inactivate E. coli in suspension, with the optimal regimen depending on the attainable peak negative focal pressure at the target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.