Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37717456›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2023

Cognitive-behavioral treatment for gambling harm: Umbrella review and meta-analysis.

Rory A Pfund, Meredith K Ginley, Hyoun S Kim, Cassandra L Boness, Tori L Horn, James P Whelan

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rory A PfundTennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, USA. Electronic address: rapfund@memphis.edu.
Meredith K GinleyTennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, USA; Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, USA.
Hyoun S KimDepartment of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada.
Cassandra L BonessCenter on Alcohol, Substance use, And Addictions, University of New Mexico, USA.
Tori L HornTennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, USA.
James P WhelanTennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, USA.
University of Memphis · USEast Tennessee State University · USTennessee Department of Education · USToronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Measurement and Multimethod Validation of Alcohol Use Disorder Etiologic MechanismsK08AA030301 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Cassandra Lee Boness · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS K08 AA030301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current umbrella review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the methodological rigor of existing meta-analyses on cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for gambling harm. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched for meta-analyses of CBT for gambling harm among individuals aged 18 years and older. The search yielded five meta-analyses that met inclusion criteria, representing 56 unique studies and 5389 participants. The methodological rigor for one meta-analyses was rated high, two were moderate, and two were critically low. Including only moderate- to high-quality meta-analyses, a robust variance estimation meta-analysis indicated that CBT significantly reduced gambling disorder severity (g = -0.91), gambling frequency (g = -0.52), and gambling intensity (g = -0.32) relative to minimal and no treatment control at posttreatment, suggesting 65%-82% of participants receiving CBT will show greater reductions in these outcomes than minimal or no treatment controls. Overall, there is strong evidence for CBT in reducing gambling harm and gambling behavior, and this evidence provides individuals, clinicians, managed care companies, and policymakers with clear recommendations about treatment selection.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyGamblingHumansCBTEvidence-based practiceGambling disorderProblem gambling

Identifiers

PMID37717456
PMCPMC11059187
OpenAlexW4386570142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.