Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37717140›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Impact of Remimazolam versus Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Cerebral Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure during Gynecological Laparoscopy with Mild Hypercapnia.

Chun Gon Park, Dongchul Lee, Wol Seon Jung, Dong Seop Kim, Youn Yi Jo, Hyun Jeong Kwak

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chun Gon ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-5058
Dongchul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Wol Seon JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Dong Seop KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Youn Yi JoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Hyun Jeong KwakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Remimazolam has the advantage of better hemodynamic stability compared with other anesthetics. We compared the effects of remimazolam and sevoflurane on cerebral oxygenation, intracranial pressure, and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters during mild hypercapnia in patients undergoing laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-two patients (20-65 years old) scheduled for gynecological laparoscopy were randomly allocated to either the remimazolam (n=31) or sevoflurane (n=31) group. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂) were recorded. Intracranial pressure was measured using the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). RESULTS The change over time in rSO₂ did not differ between groups (P=0.056). The change in ONSD over time showed a significant intergroup difference (P=0.002). ONSD significantly changed over time (P=0.034) in the sevoflurane group but not in the remimazolam group (P=0.115). The changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate over time showed significant intergroup differences (P=0.045 and 0.031, respectively). The length of stay and the use of rescue antiemetics and analgesics in the postanesthetic care unit were significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (P=0.023, 0.038, and 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Remimazolam can provide a favorable hemodynamic profile and attenuate the increase in ONSD during gynecological laparoscopy compared with sevoflurane anesthesia during lung-protective ventilation with mild hypercapnia. Remimazolam can provide faster and better postoperative recovery than sevoflurane anesthesia.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaLaparoscopyAdultAgedBenzodiazepinesHumansHypercapniaIntracranial PressureLungMiddle AgedSevofluraneYoung AdultBenzodiazepinesremimazolamSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID37717140
PMCPMC10510424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.