Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37717107›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2024

Low concentration atropine and myopia: a narrative review of the evidence for United Kingdom based practitioners.

Imran Jawaid, Kathryn Saunders, Christopher J Hammond, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Mark A Bullimore

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. How Have Animal Models Increased our Understanding of Human Myopia?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Retardation of myopia by atropine regimes.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Imran JawaidNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham, UK. Imran.jawaid@nuh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-3263
Kathryn SaundersSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9289-5731
Christopher J HammondSection of Academic Ophthalmology, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3227-2620
Annegret Dahlmann-NoorMoorfields Hospital, City Road, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7402-4350
Mark A BullimoreUniversity of Houston, College of Optometry, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6315-3720
King's College London · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of myopia is increasing across the world. Controlling myopia progression would be beneficial to reduce adverse outcomes such as retinal detachment and myopic maculopathy which are associated with increased axial length. Pharmacological control of myopia progression with atropine has been investigated since the 19th century and the benefits of slowing myopia progression are considered against the side-effects of near blur and photophobia. More recently, randomised trials have focused on determining the optimum concentration of atropine leading to low-concentration atropine being used to manage myopia progression by practitioners across the world. Currently, in the United Kingdom, there is no licensed pharmacological intervention for myopia management. The aim of this review is to interpret the available data to inform clinical practice. We conducted a narrative review of the literature and identified peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials using the search terms 'myopia' and 'atropine', limited to the English language. We identified two key studies, which were the Atropine in the Treatment Of Myopia (ATOM) and Low-concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP). Further studies were identified using the above search terms and the references from the identified literature. Atropine 0.01% has a modest effect on controlling axial length progression. Atropine 0.05% appears to be superior to atropine 0.01% in managing myopia progression. There is a dose-dependent rebound effect when treatment is stopped. Atropine is a well-tolerated, safe, and effective intervention. Treatment would be needed for several years and into adolescence, until axial length progression is stable.

Indexed as

AtropineMydriaticsMyopiaOphthalmic SolutionsDisease ProgressionHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsRefraction, OcularUnited KingdomAtropineMuscarinic AntagonistsMydriaticsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID37717107
PMCPMC10858250
OpenAlexW4386803466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.