ArticleScientific reports2023
Supervised machine learning to validate a novel scoring system for the prediction of disease remission of functional pituitary adenomas following transsphenoidal surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using machine learning to predict remission after surgery for pituitary adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endocrine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- AI-Powered MRI Radiomics and Deep Learning for Preoperative Prediction of Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas: A Clinically Oriented Review of Current Evidence.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Review
- A reliable and explainable deep learning framework for clinical-grade endocrine disorder risk prediction and decision support.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Selective resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus in pituitary surgery: results of a prospective single center analysis.Pituitary · 2025Article
- The Value of ER∝ in the Prognosis of GH- and PRL-Secreting PitNETs: Clinicopathological Correlations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional pituitary adenomas (FPAs) are associated with hormonal hypersecretion resulting in systemic endocrinopathies and increased mortality. The heterogenous composition of the FPA population has made modeling predictive factors of postoperative disease remission a challenge. Here, we aim to define a novel scoring system predictive of disease remission following transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for FPAs and validate our process using supervised machine learning (SML). 392 patients with FPAs treated at one of the three Mayo Clinic campuses were retrospectively reviewed. Variables found significant on multivariate analysis were incorporated into our novel Pit-SCHEME score. The Pit-SCHEME score with a cut-off value ≥ 6 achieved a sensitivity of 86% and positive likelihood ratio of 2.88. In SML models, without the Pit-SCHEME score, the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) model achieved the highest accuracy at 75.6%. An increase in model sensitivity was achieved with inclusion of the Pit-SCHEME score with the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model achieving an accuracy of 86.9%, which suggests the Pit-SCHEME score is the variable of most importance for prediction of postoperative disease remission. Ultimately, these results support the potential clinical utility of the Pit-SCHEME score and its prospective future for aiding in the perioperative decision making in patients with FPAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.