Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37717023›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Supervised machine learning to validate a novel scoring system for the prediction of disease remission of functional pituitary adenomas following transsphenoidal surgery.

Chase McKevitt, Ellie Gabriel, Lina Marenco-Hillembrand, Andrea Otamendi-Lopez, Suren Jeevaratnam, Joao Paulo Almeida, Susan Samson, Kaisorn L Chaichana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chase McKevittDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. chase.mckevitt@gmail.com.
Ellie GabrielDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Lina Marenco-HillembrandDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Andrea Otamendi-LopezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Suren JeevaratnamDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Joao Paulo AlmeidaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Susan SamsonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Kaisorn L ChaichanaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
WinnMed · USJacksonville College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional pituitary adenomas (FPAs) are associated with hormonal hypersecretion resulting in systemic endocrinopathies and increased mortality. The heterogenous composition of the FPA population has made modeling predictive factors of postoperative disease remission a challenge. Here, we aim to define a novel scoring system predictive of disease remission following transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for FPAs and validate our process using supervised machine learning (SML). 392 patients with FPAs treated at one of the three Mayo Clinic campuses were retrospectively reviewed. Variables found significant on multivariate analysis were incorporated into our novel Pit-SCHEME score. The Pit-SCHEME score with a cut-off value ≥ 6 achieved a sensitivity of 86% and positive likelihood ratio of 2.88. In SML models, without the Pit-SCHEME score, the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) model achieved the highest accuracy at 75.6%. An increase in model sensitivity was achieved with inclusion of the Pit-SCHEME score with the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model achieving an accuracy of 86.9%, which suggests the Pit-SCHEME score is the variable of most importance for prediction of postoperative disease remission. Ultimately, these results support the potential clinical utility of the Pit-SCHEME score and its prospective future for aiding in the perioperative decision making in patients with FPAs.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansRetrospective StudiesSupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID37717023
PMCPMC10505180
OpenAlexW4386798847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.