Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37716991›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2023

Prediction of survival and immunotherapy response by the combined classifier of G protein-coupled receptors and tumor microenvironment in melanoma.

Kangjie Shen, Qiangcheng Wang, Lu Wang, Yang Yang, Min Ren, Yanlin Li, Zixu Gao, Shaoluan Zheng, Yiteng Ding, Jiani Ji and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kangjie Shen *Department of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Qiangcheng Wang *Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lu Wang *Department of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Yang Yang *Department of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Min RenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Yanlin LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Zixu GaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Shaoluan ZhengDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Yiteng DingDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Jiani JiThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chenlu WeiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Tianyi ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Yu ZhuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Jia FengDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Feng QinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Yanwen YangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Chuanyuan WeiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China. Dr_chuanyuanwei@163.com.
Jianying GuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China. prof_jianyinggu@163.com.
Zhongshan Hospital · CNFudan University · CNZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CNJiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M710769China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022TQ0072National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972559National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203528National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272891Shanghai Sailing Program 22YF1407400Shanghai ShenKang Hospital Development Centre Project SHDC2020CR2067BXiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology 3502Z20209042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma is the deadliest form of skin tumor, and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play crucial roles in its carcinogenesis. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment (TME) affects the overall survival (OS) and the response to immunotherapy. The combination of GPCRs and TME from a multi-omics perspective may help to predict the survival of the melanoma patients and their response to immunotherapy.

methodsBulk-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), gene mutations, immunotherapy responses, and clinicopathologic feature data were downloaded from public databases, and prognostic GPCRs and immune cells were screened using multiple machine learning algorithms. The expression levels of GPCRs were detected using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in A375 and HaCaT cell lines. The GPCR-TME classifier was constructed and verified using different cohorts and multi-omics. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and tracking tumor immunophenotype (TIP) were used to identify the key biological pathways among the GPCR-TME subgroups. Then, tumor mutational burden (TMB), vital mutant genes, antigen presentation genes, and immune checkpoints were compared among the subgroups. Finally, the differences in immunotherapy response rates among the GPCR-TME subgroups were investigated.

resultsA total of 12 GPCRs and five immune cell types were screened to establish the GPCR-TME classifier. No significant differences in the expression levels of the 12 GPCRs were found in the two cell lines. Patients with high GPCR score or low TME score had a poor OS; thus, the GPCR

conclusionsWe have developed a GPCR-TME classifier that could predict the OS and immunotherapy response of patients with melanoma highly effectively based on multi-omics analysis.

Indexed as

MelanomaTumor MicroenvironmentAlgorithmsCarcinogenesisHumansImmunotherapyG protein-coupled receptorsImmunotherapyMelanomaMulti-omicsPan-cancerscRNA-seqTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37716991
PMCPMC10504724
OpenAlexW4386806249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.