ArticleNeuroImage2023
Deep learning based source imaging provides strong sublobar localization of epileptogenic zone from MEG interictal spikes.
Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of machine learning approaches to predict seizure-onset zones in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- AI enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery a scoping review.Research square · 2026Article
- Inferring neural sources from electroencephalography: foundations and frontiers.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Review
- Deep learning enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Multimodal quantitative analysis guides precise preoperative localization of epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based EEG source imaging is robust under varying electrode configurations.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for brain disease: advances in diagnosis, drug discovery, and closed-loop therapeutics.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Magnetoencephalographic source localization and reconstruction via deep learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- M/EEG source localization for both subcortical and cortical sources using a convolutional neural network with a realistic head conductivity model.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Seizure Sources Can Be Imaged from Scalp EEG by Means of Biophysically Constrained Deep Neural Networks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Simultaneous invasive and non-invasive recordings in humans: A novel Rosetta stone for deciphering brain activity.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electromagnetic source imaging (ESI) offers unique capability of imaging brain dynamics for studying brain functions and aiding the clinical management of brain disorders. Challenges exist in ESI due to the ill-posedness of the inverse problem and thus the need of modeling the underlying brain dynamics for regularizations. Advances in generative models provide opportunities for more accurate and realistic source modeling that could offer an alternative approach to ESI for modeling the underlying brain dynamics beyond equivalent physical source models. However, it is not straightforward to explicitly formulate the knowledge arising from these generative models within the conventional ESI framework. Here we investigate a novel source imaging framework based on mesoscale neuronal modeling and deep learning (DL) that can learn the sensor-source mapping relationship directly from MEG data for ESI. Two DL-based ESI models were trained based on data generated by neural mass models and either generic or personalized head models. The robustness of the two DL models was evaluated by systematic computer simulations and clinical validation in a cohort of 29 drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who underwent intracranial EEG (iEEG) evaluation or surgical resection. Results estimated from pre-operative MEG interictal spikes were quantified using the overlap with resection regions and the distance to the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) defined by iEEG recordings. The DL-based ESI provided robust results when no personalized head geometry is considered, reaching a spatial dispersion of 21.90 ± 19.03 mm, sublobar concordance of 83 %, and sublobar sensitivity and specificity of 66 and 97 % respectively. When using personalized head geometry derived from individual patients' MRI in the training data, personalized DL-based ESI model can further improve the performance and reached a spatial dispersion of 8.19 ± 8.14 mm, sublobar concordance of 93 %, and sublobar sensitivity and specificity of 77 and 99 % respectively. When compared to the SOZ, the localization error of the personalized approach is 15.78 ± 5.54 mm, outperforming the conventional benchmarks. This work demonstrates that combining generative models and deep learning enables an accurate and robust imaging of epileptogenic zone from MEG recordings with strong sublobar precision, suggesting its added value to enhancing MEG source localization and imaging, and to epilepsy source localization and other clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.