Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37716593›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Deep learning based source imaging provides strong sublobar localization of epileptogenic zone from MEG interictal spikes.

Rui Sun, Wenbo Zhang, Anto Bagić, Bin He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Deep learning-based EEG source imaging is robust under varying electrode configurations.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rui SunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Wenbo ZhangMinnesota Epilepsy Group, John Nasseff Neuroscience Center at United Hospital, Saint Paul, USA.
Anto BagićDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (UPCEC), University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, USA.
Bin HeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: bhe1@andrew.cmu.edu.
Carnegie Mellon University · USUnited Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Electrophysiological Source Imaging of Partial EpilepsyR01NS096761 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HE, BIN · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Electrophysiological source imaging guided transcranial focused ultrasoundRF1MH114233 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HE, BIN · 2017 to 2017
$2.4M
Imaging Epilepsy Sources with Biophysically Constrained Deep Neural NetworksR01NS127849 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BIN HE · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Treating pain in sickle cell disease by means of focused ultrasound neuromodulationU18EB029354 · NIBIB · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI HE, BIN · 2019 to 2019
$2.0M
Characterization of in vivo neuronal and inter-neuronal responses to transcranial focused ultrasoundR01NS124564 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI HE, BIN · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
Mind-body awareness training and brain-computer interfaceR01AT009263 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HE, BIN · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Spatio-temporal Dynamic Imaging of Seizure SourcesR01EB021027 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HE, BIN · 2016 to 2020
$1.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009263NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021027NIBIB NIH HHS U18 EB029354NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114233NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096761NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124564NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromagnetic source imaging (ESI) offers unique capability of imaging brain dynamics for studying brain functions and aiding the clinical management of brain disorders. Challenges exist in ESI due to the ill-posedness of the inverse problem and thus the need of modeling the underlying brain dynamics for regularizations. Advances in generative models provide opportunities for more accurate and realistic source modeling that could offer an alternative approach to ESI for modeling the underlying brain dynamics beyond equivalent physical source models. However, it is not straightforward to explicitly formulate the knowledge arising from these generative models within the conventional ESI framework. Here we investigate a novel source imaging framework based on mesoscale neuronal modeling and deep learning (DL) that can learn the sensor-source mapping relationship directly from MEG data for ESI. Two DL-based ESI models were trained based on data generated by neural mass models and either generic or personalized head models. The robustness of the two DL models was evaluated by systematic computer simulations and clinical validation in a cohort of 29 drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who underwent intracranial EEG (iEEG) evaluation or surgical resection. Results estimated from pre-operative MEG interictal spikes were quantified using the overlap with resection regions and the distance to the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) defined by iEEG recordings. The DL-based ESI provided robust results when no personalized head geometry is considered, reaching a spatial dispersion of 21.90 ± 19.03 mm, sublobar concordance of 83 %, and sublobar sensitivity and specificity of 66 and 97 % respectively. When using personalized head geometry derived from individual patients' MRI in the training data, personalized DL-based ESI model can further improve the performance and reached a spatial dispersion of 8.19 ± 8.14 mm, sublobar concordance of 93 %, and sublobar sensitivity and specificity of 77 and 99 % respectively. When compared to the SOZ, the localization error of the personalized approach is 15.78 ± 5.54 mm, outperforming the conventional benchmarks. This work demonstrates that combining generative models and deep learning enables an accurate and robust imaging of epileptogenic zone from MEG recordings with strong sublobar precision, suggesting its added value to enhancing MEG source localization and imaging, and to epilepsy source localization and other clinical applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyBrainBrain MappingElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyDeep neural networksElectromagnetic source imagingFocal epilepsyMEGNeural mass modelsSource localization

Identifiers

PMID37716593
PMCPMC10771628
OpenAlexW4386782747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.