Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37716368›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

The influence of patient positioning and immobilization equipment on MR image quality and image registration in radiation therapy.

Atefeh Rostami, Mostafa Robatjazi, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Nematullah Shomoossi, Ramin Shahraini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Patient setup variation on Elekta Unity and its impact on adaptive planning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Atefeh RostamiDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiological Sciences, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4736-4181
Mostafa RobatjaziDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiological Sciences, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4522-1360
Seyed Alireza JavadiniaNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2467-837X
Nematullah ShomoossiSchool of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-9404
Ramin ShahrainiDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3854-7429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMRI is preferred for brain tumor assessment, while CT is used for radiotherapy simulation. This study evaluated immobilization equipment's impact on CT-MRI registration accuracy and MR image quality in RT setup.

methodsWe included CT and MR images from 11 patients with high-grade glioma, all of whom were immobilized with a thermoplastic mask and headrest. T1- and T2-weighted MR images were acquired using an MR head coil in a diagnostic setup (DS) and a body matrix coil in RT setup. To assess MR image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were considered in some dedicated regions of interest. We also evaluated the impact of immobilization equipment on CT-MRI rigid registration using line profile and external contour methods.

resultsThe CNR and SNR reduction was in the RT setup of imaging. This was more evident in T1-weighted images than in T2-weighted ones. The SNR decreased by 14.91% and 12.09%, while CNR decreased by 25.12% and 20.15% in T1- and T2-weighted images, respectively. The immobilization equipment in the RT setup decreased the mean error in rigid registration by 1.02 mm. The external contour method yielded Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.84 and 0.92 for CT-DS MRI and CT-RT MRI registration, respectively.

conclusionThe image quality reduction in the RT setup was due to the imaged region's anatomy and its position relative to the applied coil. Furthermore, optimizing the pulse sequence is crucial for MR imaging in RT applications. Although the use of immobilization equipment may decrease the image quality in the RT setup, it does not affect organ delineation, and the image quality is still satisfactory for this purpose. Also, the use of immobilization equipment in the RT setup has increased registration accuracy.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedHumansPatient PositioningPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedbrain tumormagnetic resonance imagingthree dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37716368
PMCPMC10860429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.