Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37716289›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2023

Identification of opioid use disorder using electronic health records: Beyond diagnostic codes.

Melissa N Poulsen, Cara M Nordberg, Vanessa Troiani, Wade Berrettini, Patrick B Asdell, Brian S Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Opioid prescription patterns in long-term disease-free cancer survivors: a retrospective analysis at a single NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa N PoulsenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA. Electronic address: mpoulsen@geisinger.edu.
Cara M NordbergDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA. Electronic address: cmnordberg@geisinger.edu.
Vanessa TroianiDepartment of Autism and Developmental Medicine, Geisinger, Lewisburg, PA, USA. Electronic address: vtroiani@geisinger.edu.
Wade BerrettiniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: wadeb@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Patrick B AsdellDepartment of Family Medicine, Summa Health, Barberton, OH, USA. Electronic address: asdellp@summahealth.org.
Brian S SchwartzDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: bschwar1@jhu.edu.

Funding

Synergy Core (SynC)P50DA054071 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI Daniel A Jacobson · 2022 to 2026
$13.1M
Supplemental Application for Clinical and Genetic Risk Profile of Opioid Use DisorderR01DA044015 · NIDA · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI BERRETTINI, WADE H, ROBISHAW, JANET D · 2017 to 2021
$4.5M
Understanding the role of community determinants in opioid use disorder and program implementation factors influencing patient adherence to opioid agonist therapyK01DA049903 · NIDA · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI POULSEN, MELISSA · 2020 to 2024
$810k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA049903NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054071NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe used structured and unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data to develop and validate an approach to identify moderate/severe opioid use disorder (OUD) that includes individuals without prescription opioid use or chronic pain, an underrepresented population.

methodsUsing electronic diagnosis grouper text from EHRs of ~1 million patients (2012-2020), we created indicators of OUD-with "tiers" indicating OUD likelihood-combined with OUD medication (MOUD) orders. We developed six sub-algorithms with varying criteria (multiple vs single MOUD orders, multiple vs single tier 1 indicators, tier 2 indicators, tier 3 and 4 indicators). Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated based on chart review to determine OUD status and severity. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics of cases identified by the sub-algorithms.

resultsIn total, 14,852 patients met criteria for one of the sub-algorithms. Five sub-algorithms had PPVs ≥0.90 for any severity OUD; four had PPVs ≥0.90 for moderate/severe OUD. Demographic and clinical characteristics differed substantially between groups. Of identified OUD cases, 31.3% had no past opioid analgesic orders, 79.7% lacked evidence of chronic prescription opioid use, and 43.5% lacked a chronic pain diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Incorporating unstructured data with MOUD orders yielded an approach that adequately identified moderate/severe OUD, identified unique demographic and clinical sub-groups, and included individuals without prescription opioid use or chronic pain, whose OUD may stem from illicit opioids. Findings show that incorporating unstructured data strengthens EHR algorithms for identifying OUD and suggests approaches limited to populations with prescription opioid use or chronic pain exclude many individuals with OUD.

Indexed as

Chronic PainOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidElectronic Health RecordsHumansPrescriptionsAnalgesics, OpioidElectronic health recordsIllicit drug useOpioid use disorderPositive predictive valueValidation

Identifiers

PMID37716289
PMCPMC10620734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.