Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37716204›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia research2023

Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for inpatients with psychosis: Implementation feasibility and acceptability from a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Brandon A Gaudiano, Stacy Ellenberg, Jennifer E Johnson, Kim T Mueser, Ivan W Miller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02336581 (Effectiveness of Psychosocial Treatment for Inpatients With Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02336581 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Psychosocial Treatment for Inpatients With Psychosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorButler HospitalRan2015 to 2017Enrolled62ConditionsPsychosis, SchizophreniaArmsAcceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Enhanced Treatment as Usual (eTAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon A GaudianoAlpert Medical School of Brown University, United States of America; Butler Hospital, United States of America; Providence VA Medical Center, United States of America. Electronic address: Brandon_Gaudiano@brown.edu.
Stacy EllenbergSUNY Upstate Medical Center, United States of America.
Jennifer E JohnsonMichigan State University, United States of America.
Kim T MueserBoston University, United States of America.
Ivan W MillerAlpert Medical School of Brown University, United States of America; Butler Hospital, United States of America.
Brown University · USBoston University · USMichigan State University · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Effectiveness of Psychosocial Treatment for Inpatients with PsychosisR34MH097987 · NIMH · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI GAUDIANO, BRANDON A · 2013 to 2015
$651k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH097987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAcceptance and Commitment Therapy for Inpatients (ACT-IN) with psychosis has been found to be efficacious in previous trials, but its effectiveness has not been studied when implemented by frontline clinicians in routine settings.

methodIn this pilot randomized controlled effectiveness trial, inpatients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders were randomized to ACT-IN plus treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 23) or a time/attention matched (TAM) supportive condition plus TAU (n = 23) delivered by routine hospital staff. Both conditions received individual and group therapy during inpatient care and completed follow-up phone sessions during the first month post-discharge. Patients were assessed through 4 months post-discharge (blinded to condition) to determine feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of ACT-IN.

resultsACT-IN was feasible to deliver with fidelity by frontline staff when integrated into an acute care setting. At post-treatment, patients reported significantly greater treatment satisfaction in ACT-IN relative to TAM. Overall, results showed significant but similar improvements for both conditions through 4-month follow-up in psychiatric symptoms, functioning, and mindfulness. Only ACT-IN improved over time in distress. Furthermore, patients receiving TAM had a 3.76 times greater risk of rehospitalization over 4 months compared with ACT-IN.

conclusionsACT-IN is feasible and acceptable for patients with psychosis, can be implemented by hospital staff when integrated into acute treatment, and may result in decreased rehospitalization compared to alternative therapies. A future full-scale randomized-controlled implementation trial is warranted. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifer: NCT02336581.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyPsychotic DisordersAftercareFeasibility StudiesHumansInpatientsPatient DischargePilot ProjectsAcceptance and commitment therapyPsychiatric inpatient hospitalizationPsychosisSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID37716204
PMCPMC10841307
OpenAlexW4386809361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.