Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715917›Full record

ReviewRheumatology and therapy2023

Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence on Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Blanca Hernández-Cruz, Uta Kiltz, Jérôme Avouac, Tamas Treuer, Ewa Haladyj, Jens Gerwien, Chandreyee Dutta Gupta, Fabrizio Conti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Focus on Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Trial-Based Review.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Blanca Hernández-CruzRheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Uta KiltzRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Claudiusstraße 45, 44649, Herne, Germany.
Jérôme AvouacAP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Rhumatologie, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Tamas TreuerEli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA. treuer_tamas@lilly.com.
Ewa HaladyjEli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA.
Jens GerwienEli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA.
Chandreyee Dutta GuptaEli Lilly and Company, 893 S. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46225, USA.
Fabrizio ContiAOU Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USHôpital Cochin · FRHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESPoliclinico Umberto I · ITRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBaricitinib, an orally available small-molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, is indicated to treat active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

objectiveThis systematic review described the real-world clinical characteristics of baricitinib-treated patients with RA, prescription patterns, effectiveness, drug persistence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs; physical function, pain, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), patient global assessment (PGA), and safety of baricitinib.

methodsA PRISMA systematic review of real-world studies was conducted to identify relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2022 using MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and evidence-based medicine review databases. Websites or online repositories of the American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology were searched manually to include relevant abstracts from conferences held between January 2016 and November 2022.

resultsA total of 11,472 records were identified by searching online databases. Seventy studies were included in the study, of which 40 were abstracts. Most patients were older (51-71 years), female, and with mean RA duration of 4-19 years. Baricitinib was mostly used after the failure of one or more bDMARDs, and 4 mg dosing was prevalent in patients with RA (range 22-100%). Clinical effectiveness of baricitinib was reported in real-world settings regardless of prior biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use. Achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission was reported in 8.7-60% of patients at week 12 and CDAI low disease activity (LDA) in 20.2-81.6% at week 24. The proportion of patients attaining Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission was reported in 12% at week 4 to 45.4% at 24 weeks. Drug persistence was high, similar, or equal to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. No new safety signals were identified.

conclusionBaricitinib demonstrated effectiveness in the real-world setting with a consistent safety profile observed in clinical studies. Better persistence rates for baricitinib compared to bDMARDs with improvement in PROs were reported, although baricitinib-treated patients had RA with poor prognostic characteristics.

Indexed as

BaricitinibJanus kinase inhibitorsReal-world evidenceRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID37715917
PMCPMC10654279
OpenAlexW4386801141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.