Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715890›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2023

Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care.

Marianne A Messelink, Paco M J Welsing, Giovanna Devercelli, Jan Willem N Marsden, Helen L Leavis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05310604 (Early Detection of Primary Antibody Deficiencies in Primary Care Facilities by an Algorithm Driven Selection of Serologic Testing in Individuals at Risk.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05310604 completednot on this map

Early Detection of Primary Antibody Deficiencies in Primary Care Facilities by an Algorithm Driven Selection of Serologic Testing in Individuals at Risk.

TypeobservationalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2022 to 2023Enrolled104ConditionsPrimary Antibody DeficienciesArmsBlood withdrawal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marianne A MesselinkDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. m.a.messelink@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6291-3134
Paco M J WelsingDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-2803
Giovanna DevercelliTakeda Development Center Americas, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Jan Willem N MarsdenDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Helen L LeavisDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8720-3684
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLDeerfield (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe diagnostic delay of primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, a screening algorithm was previously developed for the early detection of patients at risk of PAD in primary care. We aimed to clinically validate and optimize the PAD screening algorithm by applying it to a primary care database in the Netherlands.

methodsThe algorithm was applied to a data set of 61,172 electronic health records (EHRs). Four hundred high-scoring EHRs were screened for exclusion criteria, and remaining patients were invited for serum immunoglobulin analysis and referred if clinically necessary.

resultsOf the 104 patients eligible for inclusion, 16 were referred by their general practitioner for suspected PAD, of whom 10 had a PAD diagnosis. In patients selected by the screening algorithm and included for laboratory analysis, prevalence of PAD was ~ 1:10 versus 1:1700-1:25,000 in the general population. To optimize efficiency of the screening process, we refitted the algorithm with the subset of high-risk patients, which improved the area under the curve-receiver operating characteristics curve value to 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.97). We propose a two-step screening process, first applying the original algorithm to distinguish high-risk from low-risk patients, then applying the optimized algorithm to select high-risk patients for serum immunoglobulin analysis.

conclusionUsing the screening algorithm, we were able to identify 10 new PAD patients from a primary care population, thus reducing diagnostic delay. Future studies should address further validation in other populations and full cost-effectiveness analyses. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov record number NCT05310604, first submitted 25 March 2022.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisPrimary Immunodeficiency DiseasesAlgorithmsHumansImmunoglobulinsPrimary Health CareImmunoglobulinsdiagnostic delayPrimary antibody deficienciesprimary care databasescreening algorithmvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID37715890
PMCPMC10660978
OpenAlexW4386800492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.