Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715871›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2023

National spine surgery registries' characteristics and aims: globally accepted standards have yet to be met. Results of a scoping review and a complementary survey.

Simona Pascucci, Francesco Langella, Michela Franzò, Marco Giovanni Tesse, Enrico Ciminello, Alessia Biondi, Eugenio Carrani, Letizia Sampaolo, Gustavo Zanoli, Pedro Berjano and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Swespine in the literature: a bibliometric analysis of trends and characteristics of publications.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Loss to follow-up after lumbar decompressive surgery: effect of collection method and perioperative factors on patient-reported outcome measures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Active and passive physical therapy in patients with chronic low-back pain: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterising patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis associated neurogenic claudication in the UK: what does the British Spinal Registry tell us?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simona PascucciScientific Secretariat of the President's Office, Italian National Institute of Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Francesco LangellaIRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Michela FranzòDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Rome, Italy.
Marco Giovanni TesseOrthopaedics Section, Department of Neuroscience and Organs of Sense, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Bari, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Enrico CiminelloScientific Secretariat of the President's Office, Italian National Institute of Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Alessia BiondiScientific Secretariat of the President's Office, Italian National Institute of Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Eugenio CarraniScientific Secretariat of the President's Office, Italian National Institute of Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Letizia SampaoloNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Gustavo ZanoliCasa Di Cura Santa Maria Maddalena, Occhiobello, Italy.
Pedro BerjanoIRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Marina TorreScientific Secretariat of the President's Office, Italian National Institute of Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy. marina.torre@iss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3851-187X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery involving implantable devices is widely used to solve several health issues. National registries are essential tools for implantable device surveillance and vigilance. In 2017, the European Union encouraged Member States to establish "registries and databanks for specific types of devices" to evaluate device safety and performance and ensure their traceability. Spine-implantable devices significantly impact patient safety and public health; spine registries might help improve surgical outcomes. This study aimed to map existing national spine surgery registries and highlight their features and organisational standards to provide an essential reference for establishing other national registries.

methodsA scoping search was performed using the Embase, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the terms "registry", "register", "implantable", and all terms and synonyms related to spinal diseases and national registries in publications from January 2000 to December 2020. This search was later updated and finalised through a web search and an ad hoc survey to collect further detailed information.

resultsSixty-two peer-reviewed articles were included, which were related to seven national spine registries, six of which were currently active. Three additional active national registries were found through the web search. The nine selected national registries were set up between 1998 and 2021. They collect data on the procedure and use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the follow-up.

conclusionOur study identified nine currently active national spine surgery registries. However, globally accepted standards for developing a national registry of spine surgery are yet to be established. Therefore, an international effort to increase result comparability across registries is highly advisable. We hope the recent initiative from the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) to establish an international collaboration will meet these needs.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSpinal DiseasesDatabases, FactualHumansPhysical ExaminationRegistriesBack painMedical deviceMusculoskeletal diseaseRegistryReviewSpine

Identifiers

PMID37715871
PMCPMC10505129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.