Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715851›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2023

Pooled Analysis of Studies Evaluating Fosnetupitant and Risk Factors for Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting During the Extended Overall Phase.

Naoki Inui, Yukihiro Toi, Yasuto Yoneshima, Masahiro Morise, Akito Hata, Kaoru Kubota, Toshiaki Saeki, Tomohide Tamura

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fosnetupitant in patients receiving cisplatin in Japan: analysis based on real-world data.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Naoki InuiSecond Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan. inui@hama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4624-7119
Yukihiro ToiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Yasuto YoneshimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masahiro MoriseDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Akito HataDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Kobe Minimally Invasive Cancer Center, Kobe, Japan.
Kaoru KubotaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-2606
Toshiaki SaekiDepartment of Breast Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Tomohide TamuraThoracic Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPKyushu University · JPNagoya University · JPNippon Medical School · JPSaitama Medical University · JPSendai Kousei Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFosnetupitant is a novel neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist (NK

methodsA pooled analysis of randomized phase II and phase III studies was performed to compare the efficacy of fosnetupitant and fosaprepitant in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue medication) rate, CINV risk factors in various phases (0-120, 0-168, and 120-168 h), and impact of the number of risk factors on the time to treatment failure (TTF) were examined in the overall and NK

resultsIn the combined cohort of NK

conclusionThis analysis revealed that fosnetupitant could have long-acting antiemetic potency (> 120 h) and indicated the importance of antiemetic therapy at 0-120 h for CINV up to 168 h after chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDexamethasoneHumansNauseaQuinuclidinesRisk FactorsVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDexamethasoneQuinuclidinesChemotherapyCisplatinNauseaNeurokinin 1 receptor antagonistVomiting

Identifiers

PMID37715851
PMCPMC10567891
OpenAlexW4386807554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.