Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715837›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

Radiological outcomes following open versus percutaneous fixation versus arthroscopically assisted percutaneous fixation of calcaneal fractures: a ten-year retrospective observational study.

Daniel Yeomans, Thomas L Lewis, Tim Pearkes, Bradley Stone, Steve Hepple, Andrew Riddick, William Harries, Michael Kelly, Ian Winson, Peter Robinson

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel YeomansAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. danyeomans@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-8786
Thomas L LewisGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tim PearkesAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Bradley StoneAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Steve HeppleAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Andrew RiddickAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
William HarriesAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Michael KellyAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Ian WinsonAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Peter RobinsonAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalcaneal fractures are often major injuries associated with considerable morbidity. The optimal surgical management of displaced calcaneal fractures remains contentious with open, percutaneous and arthroscopically assisted percutaneous approaches all offering potential benefits for patients. The aim of this study was to assess which of these three separate surgical approaches to the management of displaced calcaneal fractures provides the best radiographic deformity correction.

methodsThis is a retrospective observational study of all calcaneal fractures undergoing operative fixation at a single major trauma centre in the UK. The primary outcome was pre- and post-operative assessment of the deformity correction using radiographic parameters (angle of Gissane and Bohler's angle). Secondary outcomes included fracture configuration, complications and re-operation rate.

resultsBetween 01/01/2009 and 31/12/2019, 152 calcaneal fractures in 134 patients underwent operative management via either an open or percutaneous approach. One-way ANOVA testing of the pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters demonstrated that an open approach offered superior post-operative correction of Bohler's angle when compared to percutaneous alone (p < 0.05); however, there was no difference in post-operative angle of Gissane (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up for complication and re-operation data was 3.5 years (range 0.1-12.4). Overall complication rate following all surgical fixation was 7.2% with a further 32.2% requiring further long-term surgical intervention for subtalar arthritis or removal of metalwork.

conclusionArthroscopically assisted percutaneous fixation does not offer superior radiographic deformity correction compared to percutaneous technique alone. Open fixation yielded improved correction of Bohler's angle when compared to percutaneous alone; however, there was no difference in post-operative angle of Gissane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesCalcaneusFractures, BoneIntra-Articular FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyBohler’s angleCalcaneal fractureCalcaneus fractureDeformity correctionGissane angleMinimally invasive surgeryObservational studyOpen reduction internal fixationOsteosynthesisPercutaneous surgery

Identifiers

PMID37715837
OpenAlexW4386804253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.