Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715549›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

Genetic mixing in conservation translocations increases diversity of a keystone threatened species, Bettongia lesueur.

Heidi M Nistelberger, Emily Roycroft, Anna J Macdonald, Shelley McArthur, Lauren C White, Patrick G S Grady, Jennifer Pierson, Colleen Sims, Saul Cowen, Katherine Moseby and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Heidi M NistelbergerBiodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2957-5425
Emily RoycroftDivision of Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0956-5633
Anna J MacdonaldDivision of Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-200X
Shelley McArthurBiodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.
Lauren C WhiteDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8085-9293
Patrick G S GradyDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-7810
Jennifer PiersonAustralian Wildlife Conservancy, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4140-010X
Colleen SimsBiodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.
Saul CowenBiodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.
Katherine MosebyCentre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0691-1625
Katherine TuftArid Recovery, Roxby Downs, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3585-444X
Craig MoritzDivision of Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, ANU College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5313-7279
Mark D B EldridgeTerrestrial Vertebrates, Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-0600
Margaret ByrneBiodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7197-5409
Kym OttewellBiodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4273-3224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translocation programmes are increasingly being informed by genetic data to monitor and enhance conservation outcomes for both natural and established populations. These data provide a window into contemporary patterns of genetic diversity, structure and relatedness that can guide managers in how to best source animals for their translocation programmes. The inclusion of historical samples, where possible, strengthens monitoring by allowing assessment of changes in genetic diversity over time and by providing a benchmark for future improvements in diversity via management practices. Here, we used reduced representation sequencing (ddRADseq) data to report on the current genetic health of three remnant and seven translocated boodie (Bettongia lesueur) populations, now extinct on the Australian mainland. In addition, we used exon capture data from seven historical mainland specimens and a subset of contemporary samples to compare pre-decline and current diversity. Both data sets showed the significant impact of population founder source (whether multiple or single) on the genetic diversity of translocated populations. Populations founded by animals from multiple sources showed significantly higher genetic diversity than the natural remnant and single-source translocation populations, and we show that by mixing the most divergent populations, exon capture heterozygosity was restored to levels close to that observed in pre-decline mainland samples. Relatedness estimates were surprisingly low across all contemporary populations and there was limited evidence of inbreeding. Our results show that a strategy of genetic mixing has led to successful conservation outcomes for the species in terms of increasing genetic diversity and provides strong rationale for mixing as a management strategy.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationAnimalsAustraliaHeterozygoteSequence Analysis, DNABarrow Islandburrowing bettongconservationddRADseqhistorical DNAShark Bay Islandstarget capturetranslocation

Identifiers

PMID37715549
PMCPMC12376963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.