Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715244›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2023

Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Yangping Zhuang, Shaohuai Xia, Junwei Chen, Jun Ke, Shirong Lin, Qingming Lin, Xiahong Tang, Hanlin Huang, Nan Zheng, Yi Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yangping Zhuang *Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shaohuai Xia *Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, 541001, Guangxi, China.
Junwei Chen *Department of Emergency, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, Fujian, China.
Jun KeShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shirong LinShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Qingming LinShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiahong TangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Hanlin HuangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Nan ZhengShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Digestive Diseases, 900TH Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Fuzhou, China.
Feng ChenShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. cf9066@126.com.

Funding

2020 high level hospital foster grants from the Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Province, China 2020HSJJ042020 Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Fujian 2020J011058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of rebleeding in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains despite advances in intervention approaches. Therefore, early prediction of the risk of rebleeding could help to greatly reduce the mortality rate in these patients. We aim to develop and validate a new prediction model to predict the probability of rebleeding in patients with AUGIB.

methodsA total of 1170 AUGIB patients who completed the procedure of emergency gastroscopy within 48 h of admission were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to construct a new prediction model. A receiver operating characteristic curve, a line graph, and a calibration and decision curve were used to assess the predictive performance of our new prediction model and compare its performance with that of the AIMS65 scoring system to determine the predictive value of our prediction model.

resultsA new prediction model was constructed based on Lactic acid (LAC), neutrophil percentage (NEUTP), platelet (PLT), albumin (ALB), and D-DIMER. The AUC values and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for the new prediction model and the AIMS65 score were 0.746 and 0.619, respectively, and 0.697-0.795 and 0.567-0.670, respectively. In the training group, the C index values based on the prediction model and the AIMS65 scoring system were 0.720 and 0.610, respectively. In the validation group, the C index values based on the prediction model and the AIMS65 scoring system were 0.828 and 0.667, respectively. The decision and calibration curve analysis also showed that the prediction model was superior to the AIMS65 scoring system in terms of accuracy of prediction, consistency, and net clinical benefit.

conclusionThe prediction model can predict the probability of rebleeding in AUGIB patients after endoscopic hemostasis therapy.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal HemorrhageGastroscopyHospitalizationHumansLactic AcidNeutrophilsLactic AcidAcute upper gastrointestinal bleedingAIMS65 scoreNomogramPredictive modelRebleeding

Identifiers

PMID37715244
PMCPMC10502990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.