Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715194›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

A generalizable and interpretable model for mortality risk stratification of sepsis patients in intensive care unit.

Jinhu Zhuang, Haofan Huang, Song Jiang, Jianwen Liang, Yong Liu, Xiaxia Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinhu ZhuangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China.
Haofan HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Song JiangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Jianwen LiangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaxia YuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China. xiaxiayu@szu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to construct a mortality model for the risk stratification of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis by applying a machine learning algorithm.

methodsAdult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis during admission to ICU were extracted from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, eICU, and Zigong databases. MIMIC-III was used for model development and internal validation. The other three databases were used for external validation. Our proposed model was developed based on the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The generalizability, discrimination, and validation of our model were evaluated. The Shapley Additive Explanation values were used to interpret our model and analyze the contribution of individual features.

resultsA total of 16,741, 15,532, 22,617, and 1,198 sepsis patients were extracted from the MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, eICU, and Zigong databases, respectively. The proposed model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.84 in the internal validation, which outperformed all the traditional scoring systems. In the external validations, the AUROC was 0.87 in the MIMIC-IV database, better than all the traditional scoring systems; the AUROC was 0.83 in the eICU database, higher than the Simplified Acute Physiology Score III and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA),equal to 0.83 of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE-IV), and the AUROC was 0.68 in the Zigong database, higher than those from the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and SOFA. Furthermore, the proposed model showed the best discriminatory and calibrated capabilities and had the best net benefit in each validation.

conclusionsThe proposed algorithm based on XGBoost and SHAP-value feature selection had high performance in predicting the mortality of sepsis patients within 24 h of ICU admission.

Indexed as

SepsisAdultAlgorithmsCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsRisk AssessmentIn-ICU mortalityMulti-source dataRisk stratificationSepsisSHAPXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID37715194
PMCPMC10503007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.