ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
A generalizable and interpretable model for mortality risk stratification of sepsis patients in intensive care unit.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Sepsis mortality prediction using machine learning and deep learning - a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of predictive values of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores for mortality in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for hypothyroidism-associated delirium in elderly hypothyroid patients in the intensive care unit.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- The impact of feature combinations on machine learning models for in-hospital mortality prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis and chronic kidney disease.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Early Sepsis Prediction Using Publicly Available Data: High-Performance AI/ML Models with First-Hour Clinical Information.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Harness machine learning for multiple prognoses prediction in sepsis patients: evidence from the MIMIC-IV database.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A Quasi-Experimental Study on the Preventive Effect of Risk-Stratified Nursing Interventions for PICC-Related Thrombosis in Cancer Patients.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nutrition-integrated nomogram for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Machine learning models for mortality prediction in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis-associated acute kidney injury.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Investigating computational models for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on clinical parameters: Opportunities, challenges, and future research directions.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to construct a mortality model for the risk stratification of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis by applying a machine learning algorithm.
methodsAdult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis during admission to ICU were extracted from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, eICU, and Zigong databases. MIMIC-III was used for model development and internal validation. The other three databases were used for external validation. Our proposed model was developed based on the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The generalizability, discrimination, and validation of our model were evaluated. The Shapley Additive Explanation values were used to interpret our model and analyze the contribution of individual features.
resultsA total of 16,741, 15,532, 22,617, and 1,198 sepsis patients were extracted from the MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, eICU, and Zigong databases, respectively. The proposed model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.84 in the internal validation, which outperformed all the traditional scoring systems. In the external validations, the AUROC was 0.87 in the MIMIC-IV database, better than all the traditional scoring systems; the AUROC was 0.83 in the eICU database, higher than the Simplified Acute Physiology Score III and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA),equal to 0.83 of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE-IV), and the AUROC was 0.68 in the Zigong database, higher than those from the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and SOFA. Furthermore, the proposed model showed the best discriminatory and calibrated capabilities and had the best net benefit in each validation.
conclusionsThe proposed algorithm based on XGBoost and SHAP-value feature selection had high performance in predicting the mortality of sepsis patients within 24 h of ICU admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.