Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715164›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Making a HIIT: co-design of high-intensity interval training workouts with students & teachers within the curriculum.

Stephanie L Duncombe, Alan R Barker, Lisa Price, Jacqueline L Walker, Yong Liu, Dewi Paris, Michalis Stylianou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Was it a HIIT? A process evaluation of a school-based high-intensity interval training intervention.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie L DuncombeSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. s.duncombe@uq.net.au.
Alan R BarkerChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Public Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Lisa PriceChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Public Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jacqueline L WalkerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Yong LiuChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Public Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Dewi ParisChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Public Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Michalis StylianouSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-intensity interval training (HIIT) interventions are becoming more common in schools. However, limited input has been sought from end-users, which can help design interventions that are more engaging and context appropriate, therefore increasing their potential for successful implementation. One method of engaging end-users is co-design, which involves an active collaboration to design solutions to pre-specified problems. This paper aimed to: (1) describe the methodology and results of the co-design process in Making a HIIT to develop HIIT workouts for a school-based intervention; and (2) evaluate the feasibility and impact of co-designing HIIT workouts with students and teachers within the health and physical education (HPE) curriculum.

methodsThe development of the HIIT workouts occurred during obligatory HPE lessons with year seven and eight students. The co-design process included: (1) identifying barriers and facilitators to exercise to create evaluation criteria for creating the HIIT workouts; (2) exploring HIIT; (3) defining HIIT parameters (intensity and interval length); (4) creating HIIT workouts using the parameters and evaluation criteria; (5) trialling and modifying the HIIT workouts based on class feedback and intensity data. To evaluate the feasibility and impact of the co-design process, a thematic analysis was completed using teacher interviews, student discussions, and student surveys.

resultsFive classes comprised of 121 students (12-14 years; 49% female) and five teachers were involved in the co-design process across three schools in Queensland, Australia. A total of 33 HIIT workouts were created aimed at satisfying the HIIT parameters and variations of the following evaluation criteria: (1) fun; (2) social; (3) achievable skill level; (4) feeling accomplished; and (5) beneficial for health. From the thematic analysis, three themes (acceptability; implementation; integration) and 12 codes contributed to the overarching understanding of the feasibility of the lessons within the curriculum and a further three themes (perceived changes to lessons; educative outcomes; personal and social capabilities) and three codes contributed towards understanding their impact.

conclusionOverall, co-designing HIIT workouts was feasible within the HPE curriculum and may have contributed to positive educative outcomes. Using this methodology could improve the implementation of HIIT interventions within HPE while supporting educative benefits.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingCurriculumEducational StatusFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleStudentsFeasibilityPhysical activityPhysical educationSchoolYouth

Identifiers

PMID37715164
PMCPMC10503108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.