ArticleBMC neurology2023
Leptomeningeal neuraxis relapse in glioblastoma is an uncommon but not rare event associated with poor outcome.
Article in BMC neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial patterns of progression in reported glioblastoma cohorts after upfront chemoradiation and salvage therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Spinal Metastasis from Supratentorial Glioblastoma: A Registry-Based Case Series and a Review of the Literature.Cancers · 2025Article
- Primary diffuse leptomeningeal glioblastoma: a case report and literature review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal neuraxis leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) relapse in glioblastoma is an uncommon event that is challenging to manage. This study aims to determine the incidence, associated factors, and outcome of LM relapse in patients with glioblastoma managed with radical intent.
methodsPatients managed for glioblastoma using the EORTC-NCIC (Stupp) Protocol from 2007 to 2019 were entered into a prospective ethics-approved database. Follow-up included routine cranial MRI surveillance with further imaging as clinically indicated. LM relapse was determined by MRI findings and/or cerebrospinal fluid analysis. The chi-square test of independence was used to evaluate clinico-pathologic factors associated with increased risk of subsequent LM relapse. Median survival post-LM relapse was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique.
resultsFour-hundred-and-seven patients were eligible, with median follow-up of 60 months for surviving patients. Eleven (2.7%) had LM at first relapse and in total 21 (5.1%) experienced LM in the entire follow-up period. Sites of LM relapse were 8 (38%) focal spinal, 2 (10%) focal brainstem medulla and 11 (52%) diffuse spinal. Median overall survival from initial diagnosis for the entire cohort was 17.6 months (95% CI 16.7-19.0). Median survival from LM relapse to death was 39 days (95% CI: 19-107). Factors associated with LM relapse were age less than 50 years (p < 0.01), initial disease located in the temporal lobe (p < 0.01) and tumours lacking MGMT promoter methylation (p < 0.01).
conclusionsLM relapse is an uncommon but not rare event in patients managed radically for glioblastoma. It is associated with poor outcome with the majority of patients deceased within two months of recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.