Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715061›Full record

SynthesisCurrent nutrition reports2023

Sports Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaires Developed for the Athletic Population: a Systematic Review.

Ranil Jayawardena, Kalani Weerasinghe, Gina Trakman, Terrence Madhujith, Andrew P Hills, Nishan Sudheera Kalupahana

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current nutrition reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ranil JayawardenaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka. ranil7@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7352-9365
Kalani WeerasingheHealth and Wellness Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-9314-9714
Gina TrakmanSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2483-0899
Terrence MadhujithDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0003-2821-5719
Andrew P HillsSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-7201
Nishan Sudheera KalupahanaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-5588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSports nutrition (SN) is pivotal in aiding athletes to reach peak performance, minimize sport-related injuries, enhance career longevity, and improve general health. An accurate assessment of athletes' sports nutrition knowledge (SNK) is required to design targeted nutrition education programs aimed at enhancing both nutritional knowledge and dietary practices. This review systematically evaluates studies that use questionnaires to assess the SNK of athletes engaged in athletics. RECENT

findingsThe literature search was conducted in PubMed

Indexed as

SportsSports Nutritional SciencesAthletesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAssessmentDietKnowledgeNutritionQuestionnaireSportSurvey

Identifiers

PMID37715061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.