Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37715016›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Efficacy of cell-free DNA as a diagnostic biomarker in breast cancer patients.

Iqra Khurram, Muhammad Umer Khan, Saooda Ibrahim, Ayman Saleem, Zaman Khan, Muhammad Mubeen, Arooj Khawar, Qurban Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iqra KhurramFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, University Institute of Medical Lab Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Umer KhanInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. muhammad.umer4@mlt.uol.edu.pk.
Saooda IbrahimFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, University Institute of Medical Lab Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ayman SaleemFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, University Institute of Medical Lab Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Zaman KhanFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, University Institute of Medical Lab Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad MubeenFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, University Institute of Medical Lab Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Arooj KhawarFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, University Institute of Medical Lab Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Qurban AliDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. saim1692@gmail.com.
University of Lahore · PKUniversity of the Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent and leading cause of mortality worldwide among women. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis is an alternative quantitative approach to conventional methods for cancer diagnosis. The current research project aimed to determine the efficacy of cfDNA as a diagnostic biomarker in breast cancer patients in Pakistan. Eighty-four female breast cancer patients were selected as cases, and 152 healthy females as controls. Immunohistochemistry was performed to identify tumor biomarkers along with clinical profiling. cfDNA was extracted from serum using the phenol-chloroform method. The cfDNA level in the serum was estimated using Agarose Gel Electrophoresis and Nanodrop. SPPS version 25.0 was used to perform statistical analyses. The results showed that the cancer biomarkers were significantly associated with breast cancer. The changes in hematological parameters were insignificant, whereas the biochemical parameter variations between the cases and controls were statistically significant. A significant association of cfDNA level with breast cancer was observed. Further cfDNA levels and cancer biomarkers were not statistically significant. A significant correlation was observed between cfDNA and biochemical parameters, except for creatinine, whereas hematological parameters showed no significant correlation.ROC analysis declared cfDNA as an authentic diagnostic marker for breast cancer. It was concluded that the level of cfDNA is significantly increased in breast cancer patients and can be utilized as a diagnostic biomarker.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsBiomarkers, TumorChloroformCreatinineFemaleHumansBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsChloroformCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID37715016
PMCPMC10504267
OpenAlexW4386763052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.