ReviewScientific reports2023
Meticulous research for design of plasmonics sensors for cancer detection and food contaminants analysis via machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Review in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-driven routing and layered architectures for intelligent ICT in nanosensor networked systems.iScience · 2026Review
- Metal-Organic-Framework-Based Optical Biosensors: Recent Advances in Pathogen Detection and Environmental Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Biodetection Systems: Principles, Progress and Applications-A Comprehensive Review.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Plasmonic nanoparticle sensors: current progress, challenges, and future prospects.Nanoscale horizons · 2024Review
- AI-Assisted Detection of Biomarkers by Sensors and Biosensors for Early Diagnosis and Monitoring.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Observation of Plasmonics Talbot effect in graphene nanostructures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, making early detection and accurate diagnosis critical for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for cancer detection, enabling the development of innovative algorithms that can analyze vast amounts of data and provide accurate predictions. This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the various ML algorithms and techniques employed for cancer detection, highlighting recent advancements, challenges, and future directions in this field. The main challenge is finding a safe, auditable and reliable analysis method for fundamental scientific publication. Food contaminant analysis is a process of testing food products to identify and quantify the presence of harmful substances or contaminants. These substances can include bacteria, viruses, toxins, pesticides, heavy metals, allergens, and other chemical residues. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (A.I) proposed as a promising method that possesses excellent potential to extract information with high validity that may be overlooked with conventional analysis techniques and for its capability in a wide range of investigations. A.I technology used in meta-optics can develop optical devices and systems to a higher level in future. Furthermore (M.L.) and (A.I.) play key roles as a health Approach for nano materials NMs safety assessment in environment and human health research. Beside, benefits of ML in design of plasmonic sensors for different applications with improved resolution and detection are convinced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.