Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37714154›Full record

ArticleCell stem cell2023

Allele-specific expression reveals genetic drivers of tissue regeneration in mice.

Katya L Mack, Heather E Talbott, Michelle F Griffin, Jennifer B L Parker, Nicholas J Guardino, Amanda F Spielman, Michael F Davitt, Shamik Mascharak, Mauricio Downer, Annah Morgan and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stem cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hallmarks of regeneration.Cell stem cell · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katya L MackStanford University, Department of Biology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Heather E TalbottStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michelle F GriffinStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jennifer B L ParkerStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nicholas J GuardinoStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Amanda F SpielmanStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael F DavittStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Shamik MascharakStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mauricio DownerStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Annah MorganStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Caleb ValenciaStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Deena AkrasStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mark J BergerStanford University, Department of Computer Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Derrick C WanStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA.
Hunter B FraserStanford University, Department of Biology, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: hbfraser@stanford.edu.
Michael T LongakerStanford School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: longaker@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Center for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Tissue and Organ Regeneration (C-DOCTOR)U24DE029463 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHAI, YANG, LOTZ, JEFFREY C. · 2020 to 2024
$29.5M
Yeast as a model for understanding gene expression adaptationR01GM097171 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, HUNTER B · 2012 to 2024
$4.2M
Mechanoresponsive Engrailed-1-negative fibroblasts activate Engrailed-1 to promote fibrosis in wound healingR01GM136659 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS U24 DE029463NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097171NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM136659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In adult mammals, skin wounds typically heal by scarring rather than through regeneration. In contrast, "super-healer" Murphy Roths Large (MRL) mice have the unusual ability to regenerate ear punch wounds; however, the molecular basis for this regeneration remains elusive. Here, in hybrid crosses between MRL and non-regenerating mice, we used allele-specific gene expression to identify cis-regulatory variation associated with ear regeneration. Analyzing three major cell populations (immune, fibroblast, and endothelial), we found that genes with cis-regulatory differences specifically in fibroblasts were associated with wound-healing pathways and also co-localized with quantitative trait loci for ear wound-healing. Ectopic treatment with one of these proteins, complement factor H (CFH), accelerated wound repair and induced regeneration in typically fibrotic wounds. Through single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), we observed that CFH treatment dramatically reduced immune cell recruitment to wounds, suggesting a potential mechanism for CFH's effect. Overall, our results provide insights into the molecular drivers of regeneration with potential clinical implications.

Indexed as

EarWound HealingAllelesAnimalsCicatrixMammalsMiceMice, Inbred Strainsfibroblastsfibrosisgene expression analysisgeneticsgenomicsregenerationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID37714154
PMCPMC10592051
OpenAlexW4386779375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.