Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37713810›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of psychology2024

The Relation Between Attention and Memory.

Nelson Cowan, Chenye Bao, Brittney M Bishop-Chrzanowski, Amy N Costa, Nathaniel R Greene, Dominic Guitard, Chenyuan Li, Madison L Musich, Zehra E Ünal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Beyond mere novelty: Categorization drives differentiation.The British journal of social psychology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cue-driven attentional guidance nearly eliminates salience effects in working memory.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nelson CowanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.
Chenye BaoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.
Brittney M Bishop-ChrzanowskiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.
Amy N CostaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.
Nathaniel R GreeneDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.
Dominic GuitardSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Chenyuan LiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.
Madison L MusichDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.
Zehra E ÜnalDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA; email: CowanN@missouri.edu.

Funding

Working memory, attention, and time: Childhood development and adult functionR01HD021338 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI COWAN, NELSON · 1988 to 2023
$7.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD021338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relation between attention and memory has long been deemed important for understanding cognition, and it was heavily researched even in the first experimental psychology laboratory by Wilhelm Wundt and his colleagues. Since then, the importance of the relation between attention and memory has been explored in myriad subdisciplines of psychology, and we incorporate a wide range of these diverse fields. Here, we examine some of the practical consequences of this relation and summarize work with various methodologies relating attention to memory in the fields of working memory, long-term memory, individual differences, life-span development, typical brain function, and neuropsychological conditions. We point out strengths and unanswered questions for our own embedded processes view of information processing, which is used to organize a large body of evidence. Last, we briefly consider the relation of the evidence to a range of other theoretical views before drawing conclusions about the state of the field.

Indexed as

CognitionIndividualityHumansMemory, Long-Termattention and memorydevelopmentlong-term memoryneuroscienceselective attentionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID37713810
PMCPMC12143923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.