Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37713540›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

Impact of sample size and regression of tissue-specific signals on effective connectivity within the core default mode network.

Alexander N Silchenko, Felix Hoffstaedter, Simon B Eickhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander N SilchenkoInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5591-238X
Felix HoffstaedterInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7163-3110
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-2759

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions within brain networks are inherently directional, which are inaccessible to classical functional connectivity estimates from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) but can be detected using spectral dynamic causal modeling (DCM). The sample size and unavoidable presence of nuisance signals during fMRI measurement are the two important factors influencing the stability of group estimates of connectivity parameters. However, most recent studies exploring effective connectivity (EC) have been conducted with small sample sizes and minimally pre-processed datasets. We explore the impact of these two factors by analyzing clean resting-state fMRI data from 330 unrelated subjects from the Human Connectome Project database. We demonstrate that both the stability of the model selection procedures and the inference of connectivity parameters are highly dependent on the sample size. The minimum sample size required for stable DCM is approximately 50, which may explain the variability of the DCM results reported so far. We reveal a stable pattern of EC within the core default mode network computed for large sample sizes and demonstrate that the use of subject-specific thresholded whole-brain masks for tissue-specific signals regression enhances the detection of weak connections.

Indexed as

ConnectomeDefault Mode NetworkBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetSample Size

Identifiers

PMID37713540
PMCPMC10619387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.