ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
Impact of sample size and regression of tissue-specific signals on effective connectivity within the core default mode network.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crus control: effective cerebello-cerebral connectivity during social action prediction using dynamic causal modelling.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Predicting response speed and age from task-evoked effective connectivity.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Impact of sample size and regression of tissue-specific signals on effective connectivity within the core default mode network.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interactions within brain networks are inherently directional, which are inaccessible to classical functional connectivity estimates from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) but can be detected using spectral dynamic causal modeling (DCM). The sample size and unavoidable presence of nuisance signals during fMRI measurement are the two important factors influencing the stability of group estimates of connectivity parameters. However, most recent studies exploring effective connectivity (EC) have been conducted with small sample sizes and minimally pre-processed datasets. We explore the impact of these two factors by analyzing clean resting-state fMRI data from 330 unrelated subjects from the Human Connectome Project database. We demonstrate that both the stability of the model selection procedures and the inference of connectivity parameters are highly dependent on the sample size. The minimum sample size required for stable DCM is approximately 50, which may explain the variability of the DCM results reported so far. We reveal a stable pattern of EC within the core default mode network computed for large sample sizes and demonstrate that the use of subject-specific thresholded whole-brain masks for tissue-specific signals regression enhances the detection of weak connections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.