Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37713469›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

A machine learning-based quantitative model (LogBB_Pred) to predict the blood-brain barrier permeability (logBB value) of drug compounds.

Bilal Shaker, Jingyu Lee, Yunhyeok Lee, Myeong-Sang Yu, Hyang-Mi Lee, Eunee Lee, Hoon-Chul Kang, Kwang-Seok Oh, Hyung Wook Kim, Dokyun Na

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AI platform for CRISPR functional mapping and function-based drug design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bilal ShakerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
Jingyu LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
Yunhyeok LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
Myeong-Sang YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
Hyang-Mi LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
Eunee LeeDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Epilepsy Research Institute, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hoon-Chul KangDepartment of Anatomy College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Seok OhConvergence Drug Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4242-0818
Hyung Wook KimDepartment of Bio-integrated Science and Technology, College of Life Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.
Dokyun NaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationEfficient assessment of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration ability of a drug compound is one of the major hurdles in central nervous system drug discovery since experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. To advance and elevate the success rate of neurotherapeutic drug discovery, it is essential to develop an accurate computational quantitative model to determine the absolute logBB value (a logarithmic ratio of the concentration of a drug in the brain to its concentration in the blood) of a drug candidate.

resultsHere, we developed a quantitative model (LogBB_Pred) capable of predicting a logBB value of a query compound. The model achieved an R2 of 0.61 on an independent test dataset and outperformed other publicly available quantitative models. When compared with the available qualitative (classification) models that only classified whether a compound is BBB-permeable or not, our model achieved the same accuracy (0.85) with the best qualitative model and far-outperformed other qualitative models (accuracies between 0.64 and 0.70). For further evaluation, our model, quantitative models, and the qualitative models were evaluated on a real-world central nervous system drug screening library. Our model showed an accuracy of 0.97 while the other models showed an accuracy in the range of 0.29-0.83. Consequently, our model can accurately classify BBB-permeable compounds as well as predict the absolute logBB values of drug candidates. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Web server is freely available on the web at http://ssbio.cau.ac.kr/software/logbb_pred/. The data used in this study are available to download at http://ssbio.cau.ac.kr/software/logbb_pred/dataset.zip.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrainBiological TransportCentral Nervous System AgentsPermeabilityCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID37713469
PMCPMC10560102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.